User talk:Vobedd/Archive 1

Orphaned non-free image File:Chartjackers episode 7.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Chartjackers episode 7.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

UK Indie
I'm uncomfortable with your change. I recognise that it is often called the "UK Indie" chart, and that's why "UKindie" is an acceptable argument. However, if you look at the OCC archive, it is called the "UK Independent" chart: here. Is there any other publication directly by the OCC that calls it the "UK Indie" chart?&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey there, I'm sorry that the change made you uncomfortable. It just struck me as odd that the template's 'UKindie' parameter outputted "UK Independent", but linked to an article titled UK Indie Chart—I was just worried that this could potentially be rather confusing and incongruous for readers. Would it therefore perhaps make more sense to rename the UK Indie Chart article "UK Independent Chart", since this is how it is listed on the OCC website?
 * I've checked one or two back issues, and Music Week does NOT seem to be directly linked to the OCC. ChartsPlus has formally licensed the official charts from The Official UK Charts Company (whatever that means), and the OCC compiles the singles chart for Radio 1. Would these be direct enough links to justify calling it the UK Indie Chart? Vobedd731 (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You notice I didn't revert you. There's been a redirect from UK Independent Chart to UK Indie Chart since March 2008. I'd really be happier with the change if I found an OCC directly published item that called it "indie", but I can respect the argument that nearly everyone else calls it "indie". I may wind up taking this discussion to WT:Record charts and getting more input.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a page on the OCC website where they use the word "indie" to describe the Independent Chart. The two words seem to be pretty interchangeable though, and I suppose I have no personal preference about which is used. I just felt that, since the title of the article that describes the chart uses "indie", the template should reflect that. But I think you're right about the issue requiring more discussion to reach a consensus. Vobedd731 (talk) 08:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Your message at Requests for feedback
ǝɥʇ M0N0 04:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination for I've Got Nothing
Hello! Your submission of I've Got Nothing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 28bytes (talk) 23:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for I've Got Nothing
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Alex Day
Talk:Alex Day, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Alex Day and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Alex Day during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nominal (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Chartjackers episodes/archive1
Hi Vobedd. The nominator's support is assumed when a list is at FLC, so we can't really count the support you added recently. Would you mind de-bolding the support so the other directors won't get confused the next time they go through FLC? Thanks. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 19:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Yumiko Hotta
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Vobedd,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Circle radians.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 23, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-09-23. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)