User talk:VogueIn

October 2019
Hello, I'm !dea4u. I noticed that in this edit to Mena Massoud, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  !dea4u   08:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Deepti Jal Singh, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

A recent edit of yours to the page Deepti Jal Singh had an edit summary that appears to be purposely inaccurate or inappropriate. Edit summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Be careful. You may be blocked from editing without further warning. -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Deepti Jal Singh. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page,  you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Rmhermen (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Deepti in 2019.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Deepti in 2019.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Deepti Jal Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepti Jal Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deepti Jal Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FitIndia Talk Commons 15:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Greetings to whom this may concern.

I am appalled by the decision that Deepti Jal Singh’s article is even considered for deletion. Wikipedia would not have accepted this article if it did not have significant evidence to prove it’s authenticity as well as notability. Deepti Jal Singh has her own knowledge panel on google and several articles written on and about her. How and why this article page is even considered for deletion makes me wonder if it’s really about notability, well because she meets it, or something else. There are many new comer actresses and actors on Wikipedia that has less information and is not up for deletion and I am happy to name them all. This feels like an attack on this actress doubting her notability is just disrespectful. If you are talking about criteria, you should be aware that Wikipedia would not even create the article if it did not meet the requirements needed for article notability and creation. She has been the only Indian female to be on the South African most hottest actresses on Briefly’s article as well as top 10 Kamala Khan Casting choices for marvel. She was the first Indian face for Nescafè - South Africa for international coffee day. She was on a show that won a Golden screen award. What more notability do you want? I advise that you do intensive research about an individual before making assumptions. The decisions you make have consequences. Before creating the article all boxes were checked.

Regards. VogueIn (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you want to make an argument for keeping the article, then you need to make it at the Articles for deletion/Deepti Jal Singh. -- Whpq (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Deepti Jal Singh. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Deepti Jal Singh. Favonian (talk) 19:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Deepti Jal Singh, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepti Jal Singh


A tag has been placed on Deepti Jal Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Deepti Jal Singh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 17:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepti Jal Singh


A tag has been placed on Deepti Jal Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Deepti Jal Singh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Nahal (T) 17:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)