User talk:Voidz/Archive 01

Speedy deletion for Chantal Leccia
Voidz, I have only just created the article: Chantal Leccia, leave me time to edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesGrantham (talk • contribs) 15:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Please read
Viodz, the page will be complete wthin two days, I am at the moment making the page in my sandbox and then I will publish it when it is complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesGrantham (talk • contribs) 16:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Good and all the best! Also, please, don't forget to sign your comments using ~ . Thanks, Voidz (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:13-witches.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:13-witches.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Green Drinks (vegetables)
Hello, Voidz,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Green Drinks (vegetables) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Green Drinks (vegetables).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PeaceMagazine(1991).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:PeaceMagazine(1991).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is. JohnCD (talk) 18:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Dustin Case.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dustin Case.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinetic Band


A tag has been placed on Kinetic Band, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 23:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IChat Mediation


A tag has been placed on IChat Mediation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 07:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Netherlands_Red_Cross
See report here about the copyright infringement at Netherlands_Red_Cross. Only 8 matching phrases and am wondering what can I replace figures with? Can 610,000 be put to be something else? Do I rewrite their motto with any other words? Let me know if that is possible unless we decide to put in lies in there. Mojoemoji (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Netherlands Red Cross
This page => Netherlands Red Cross should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I have reworded the article to the best I can. There are some statements that must appear as they are from the source like the motto and name of the organization and its mother organization. Some numbers like the number of volunteers and staff must also appear as they are from the source. Some terms like Red cross must also appear as they are at the source unless the terms and numbers are metamorphosing to something else once they come to Wikipedia. See dup report here Mojoemoji (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * As i can see there are no copyvio now so you may remove the template if you feel the article is completed. - Voidz  (t·c) 05:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Justin Johnson (singer)
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Justin Johnson (singer), appears to be directly copied from http://justinjohnson.com/about.html. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Justin Johnson (singer) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Frostbox, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 13:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kinetic Band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Balance, Cardio, Strength and Set


 * David Alssema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Duncan


 * Jessica Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to AVN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Stella Mahlisa
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Stella Mahlisa, appears to be directly copied from http://stellamahlisa.com/pages/about-us. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Stella Mahlisa if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Janaway


The article Matt Janaway has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - this article is sourced solely to self-written materials and databases. "Matt Janaway" gets zero gnews hits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Koukouvaya


A tag has been placed on Koukouvaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hairline Illusions


The article Hairline Illusions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An apparent WP:PROMO piece, sourced almost exclusively to WP:SPS sources or promotional materials (which generally don't have the information they are being cited for). Only Gnews hits are this and this article on microcredit that uses the company as an example.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Justin Johnson (singer)


The article Justin Johnson (singer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - the information in this article is all sourced either to sources that do not carry the information supposedly being sourced, or to an autobiography on IMDb. No sign given of actual notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TextHub


The article TextHub has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - article makes no particular claim of notability, only one source isn't self-published or a database. Gnews has no hits except for a press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Day An Angel Ran Into My Room


The article The Day An Angel Ran Into My Room has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sign of meeting WP:NBOOKS; past the 1 millionth place in Amazon print sales rank. Only Gnews hit is two paragraphs in a blog.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ari Admani


The article Ari Admani has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - the nearest to a claim of notability is that he has business links to certain celebrities, and even those links are not noted in the references provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:58, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

What is up?
Voidz, I've been going through the articles that you've created, and they seem to be generally weakly sourced articles for topics that have no reasonable source for notability in them, and for items that do not appear to be notable with research. This leaves me wondering whether you are simply unfamiliar with the Wikipedia guidelines on notability and reliable sources, or whether you are editing here with the intent to create promotional pages, or whether there is some other possible explanation for this that I am missing. Let me know if I can help you sort out what you're doing, so that in the future neither your time nor other editors' time is wasted in dealing with such matters. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Day An Angel Ran Into My Room


A tag has been placed on The Day An Angel Ran Into My Room, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Justin Johnson (singer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Johnson (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Justin Johnson (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sutton McKee


The article Sutton McKee has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY - no clear claim of notability, sourced to databases, an article written by a close friend, and an article mentioning that one of his films would show at a local event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Book Cover-forThe-Day-Angel.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Book Cover-forThe-Day-Angel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The MonsterJunkies (novel)
Hello, Voidz. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The MonsterJunkies (novel), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)