User talk:Voiton

Todd McLaughlin
You may (very probably do) need to add some more substantive details to this article. While the details you have are... detailed, I believe articles about musical artists require some instances of notable output, such as recordings.

At first glance I was ready to slap a note questioning the notability of the artist on the article. This takes two different forms, either (see template:db-band) or  (see template:afd) or possibly  (see template:prod). The first is often too quick to respond to, unless someone else thinks it should be saved. The second process can take up to a week and allows various people to comment (vote) on whether the article should or should not be kept. Then you would have a chance to respond with your arguments, but only if you notice the 'tagging' soon enough.

Anyway, don't be surprised if someone else comes along sooner-or-later and wonders, not if the article is a good (well-constructed) article, but whether the subject of the article is sufficiently notable. Shenme 04:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Todd McLaughlin
A template has been added to the article Todd McLaughlin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Bongwarrior 03:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:ToddUp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ToddUp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)