User talk:Voleares195

A page you started (Matthew William Knowles) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Matthew William Knowles, Voleares195!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hello, Wikipedian. This message is to let you know the article you recently created has been reviewed. Happy editing!"

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Matthew William Knowles
Hi, I'm Jbhunley. Voleares195, thanks for creating Matthew William Knowles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider returning to the article to address this issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. J bh Talk  14:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew William Knowles
Hello, Voleares195. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Matthew William Knowles, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. J bh Talk  14:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew William Knowles


A tag has been placed on Matthew William Knowles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Voleares195, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Matthew William Knowles has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello JJMC89 and thank you for your review of Draft:Matthew William Knowles. I have made further edits and have asked for and received permission to use the content in question. A WP:OTRS tag has been added to the page.

Draft:Matthew William Knowles referencing
You need to stop trying to use unreliable sources and fake references. baike.baidu.com, a wiki, is not a reliable source. Adding fake references (like using [4] ) is not acceptable. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 19:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Are you referring to source: "美籍艺人马泰勇闯中国娱乐圈 外型帅气表现抢眼" [Dawn of Chinese-American artist Mattei]. Xinhua Entertainment. September 15, 2014. as being 'fake'? If not, what reference do you consider fake?

--Voleares195 (talk) 19:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Never mind - found the strange links you were referring to! Do you think it would be okay to add the Baike references as "additional resources"? Those for some of the programs are the broadcasts official pages. --Voleares195 (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew William Knowles (December 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Icebob99 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew William Knowles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Icebob99 (talk) 21:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Kspellskarthik

 * Please note that Wikipedia is not a 'forum'. It is an encyclopaedia. Peridon (talk) 11:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

You state that you never claimed to be Matthew Knowles. The claim was made at File:MatthewWKnowles.jpg where you claim the author of the image is "Matthew W. Knowles", that the source is your own work (very specifically that you, Voleares195, are Matthew W. Knowles), and that you, the copyright holder, release it under the CC-by-sa-4.0 license. If you are indeed not Matthew Knowles, this is a serious issue, albeit one for Wikimedia Commons to deal with, rather than en.wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * TO date I have done all that I can to communicate that I am a new editor to Wikipedia and very clearly admitted my efforts to learn in my attempt to create this page. The image upload credit to Author Matthew Knowles File:MatthewWKnowles.jpg, if considered wisely, is obviously the same rookie mistake. My most sincere apologies. I am happy to correct this mistake, remove the image or even to contact and asked Mr Knowles to authorize the copyright to this image as I did with his bio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)