User talk:Volgabulgari

Blocked as a sockpuppet

 * On Wikipedia, the term "sockpuppetry" refers to the misuse of multiple accounts. Thus, the term "sockpuppet" refers to an account that was created in violation of our policy on multiple accounts. While multiple accounts can have legitimate uses, it is against the rules to use multiple accounts in a way that makes it look like there are multiple people editing when really it is just one. Additionally, if you are blocked from Wikipedia because of something you did, it is against the rules to create a new account to continue editing—if you do so, any such accounts will be blocked, and all of their contributions may be summarily reverted (see Blocking policy). Indeed, this particular block exists because your previous account  was blocked on 26 April 2023, and that account was blocked because you appear to have been blocked while your were logged out, see Special:Contributions/159.146.14.0/24 (note: I am merely referencing this block log) . Instead of creating new accounts to edit, you need to successfully request an unblock first. Mz7 (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Request of an unblock
Volgabulgari (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Despite your pledge to regain your trust through my future actions, I have just blocked as another attempt to evade your current block. At this point, I am not inclined to accept your unblock request. I would refer you to Standard offer if you would like to be unblocked in the future. Mz7 (talk) 21:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I've attempted to initiate communication with you over the course of several days, addressing request topics related to Chuvash Studies and Volgabulgari. Still, I've not received any response from you during this extended period. I suspect that if you weren't subject to a ban under the username "Hunogur," you may still not have provided a reply. I am even sure about that. No, I will not asking you anything. Decline my request and stop talking with me in my page. @Mz7 Volgabulgari (talk) 09:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

O7
{{unblock|{{unblock reviewed |1= Sir_Sputnik (regarding your decline reason) The problem is, I didn't know what "socking" or "sockpuppet" meant until I met him. I requested an unblock, but he ignored me for weeks. Then I created another account and edited something irrelevant to the page where I was blocked. He replied and said that he banned this account as well. Thanks for him to saving Wikipedia from vandals like me. First of all, you are accusing me of "socking," but my edits weren't biased, and I didn't edit the page where I was banned. I wasn't sure if I was personally banned until I got banned again. It seems that he will ban me no matter what I do. If I had known this, why would I edit pages that I had actively contributed to with my old account? Secondly, I really want to contribute to Wikipedia. If you look at the accounts I've been banned with, none of the contributions were disruptive or biased except maybe first ones but I apologized about them. I thought Beshogur deleting my edits because he didn't trust my account then I wanted to use other account. It's so stressful to talk about this issue.I won't be very active again, but I still want to legally contribute to Wikipedia, especially regarding Chuvash culture, language, and related pages. I also want to edit contents about ancient books. I made important edits to Chuvash and Bulgar pages. I want to do it more. If you decide to unblock me, you can watch my moves for months. I will not disappoint you. I apologize for all my mistakes, and now I'm requesting an unblock. |decline = You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This was confirmed by a WP:check user. That has nothing to do with bias. There is no excuse for evading your block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)}}

-- Deepfriedokra Why are Chuvash Studies and Hunoghur still banned if their edits have no connection to the reason for own block? If this is not solely about biased edits, then what is the justification for their continued suspension? Moreover, if the intention is to ban all accounts associated with my IP address, how can it be claimed that Wikipedia is a platform that upholds freedom of speech? Weird.