User talk:VoliBear

August 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Kirkuk. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry that your first experience of editing has been frustrating. Luckily there are lots of people around who are willing to help. You can stop by the Teahouse where new users can ask questions to experienced editors in a comfortable and non-threatening environment. You might also want to visit the help desk or browse the help pages.

Topher385 (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Your edits to Kirkuk were removed because you removed content including sourced content with no explanation. Please use the edit summary box to explain why you are removing the content. If you have concerns with the accuracy of the information, voice your concerns at article's talk page. Please note that if you continue removing content with no explanation, you will be blocked. Although you had the best intentions with this edit, the article Sofia isn't a collection of variants of the name, rather the article is for the geographical location. Additionally, the Turkish variant of the name is irrelevant to a Croatian-related article. Note that this isn't an attack to you, but rather advice. Adding a collection of variants would overwhelm the article. I strongly suggest visiting Introduction to learn more about editing.

SwisterTwister  talk  23:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;