User talk:Volodymir k~enwiki

Where "we people" came from
I have registered in English Wiki in 2006 because:
 * I was enthusiastic about propagating knowledge and help improving the world
 * I had much free time
 * I wanted to make reservation of the same user name as in Russian Wiki (where I contributed translations from English wiki)
 * in the case I will notice misspelling or another opportunity to improve some article's quality.


 * Excuse me, but the revert you just did was hardly a positive contribution.Biophys (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I consider clarifications and adjusting biases as positive. Most your contributions seem to me as a sheer anti-Putin propaganda. That is neither crime nor a sin, just sometimes they need some verification. I have left a comment in talk page explaining why my changes were needed and waited for couple of days for any objections.
 * Also please add new section to my talk page with article name so other readers don't guess what revert you are talking about. Thanks! Volodymir k (talk) 09:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Plans
Barysaw -- add new from Russian; BATE!

Nicholas I of Russia -- "one of the most reactionary"? Culture = "Westernizers / Slavophiles"?

Russification -- link 29 is a stupid hearsay, forums are not authoritative source.

Українофобія -> add sections to Anti-Ukrainian_sentiment

Official_Nationality needs explaination; e.g. on http://hronos.km.ru/biograf/uvarov.html ro http://nationalism.org/bratstvo/oprichnik/23/soloviyov.htm

Notability of Russian Journal (website)
A tag has been placed on Russian Journal (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pastor Theo (talk) 12:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Russian Journal (website)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Russian Journal (website), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Russian Journal (website). Thank you. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Political technologist listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political technologist. Since you had some involvement with the Political technologist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Volodymir k. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Volodymir k~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Book Beskonechnyi Tupik Galkovsky.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Book Beskonechnyi Tupik Galkovsky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Foundation for Effective Politics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foundation for Effective Politics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foundation for Effective Politics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Shobhit102 |  talk  04:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)