User talk:Volunteer Marek/Archives/2009/August

Władysław Łukasiuk
Thanks for your message on my talk page.

I was looking at the above article as it was listed as unsourced, so I also looked for English-language references. I don't read Polish, so that was why I left the message on WikiProject Poland asking for others more knowledgeable about the subject and language to find citations.

Thanks for your work on this - he's obviously notable, so it would be nice if people could find good citations!

Regards, --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 16:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

changes to volyn voivod page
Where, here, does it say that "Ukrainians who refused to take part in the mass murders were also terrorised and killed by the assailants", and how is this a credible, allowable source to even use on wikipedia?--Львівське (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You're right it's not in that ref, it's in the other, as well as in the ones I've provided on talk. But this is a reason to remove the irrelevant ref, rather then the text, which is still sourced to other refs.radek (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:translation
The information that follows the quote is a discussion whether or not a "whitebook" made sense, and that how Rhode and others argued, it is not related to the Rhode figure at all. Skäpperöd (talk) 20:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Władysław Łukasiuk

 * When you write military related articles, you may want to list them at WP:MILCON. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Re
This is mine from this topic at Polish Wiki: Bronisław Szeremeta, Władysław Filar, Polska samoobrona na Wołyniu, Wojciech Lis, Akcja Zachód, Bitwa pod Kuryłówką, Ludwik Więcław, Akcja Nieszpory, Amnestia w 1947 roku. I will help you with this biographical entries, after my vacations (for a week).--Paweł5586 (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * About 25-26 I will back. Look at my addition in Dmytro Klyachkivsky page. Correct it plz. Now I will make Władysław Filar article. --Paweł5586 (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * There it is Władysław Filar. Take a look plz.--Paweł5586 (talk) 16:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Zwróćcie uwagę na Lwów, Grody Czerwieńskie, Ruś Czerwoną. Ukraińcy tam bzdury wypisują. Po pierwsze hasła Grody Czerwieńskie nie ma. Po drugie w 981 Włodzimierz podbił Grody Czerwieńskie które były zamieszkane przez polskie plemiona Lędzian które wg. jJednego źródła były niezależne a według drugiego znajdowały się już w państwie Mieszka I. Potem ziemie te przechodziły z rąk do rąk pomiędzy Rusią a Polską. W między czasie na tych etnicznie polskich ziemiach powstał Lwów, prawdopodobnie w miejscu osady Lędzian. Potem ziemie te nazywano Rusią Czerwoną od nazwy Grody Czerwieńskie. W 1340 prawem spadkobierstwa (a nie podboju!) zajął je Kazimierz Wielki, można powiedzieć że ziemie te wróciły do Polski. Articles: Lendians, Red Ruthenia, Lviv. New Cherven towns is needed. --Paweł5586 (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

We already have Battle of Kuryłówka actually though it omits some of the nastier parts that are in the Polish wiki articles (like Wolyniak's actions).radek (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Expulsion of Germans
Seems that Skaperod managed to get the article protected. Loosmark (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Please stick around the Chetniks talk page. I desperately need someone with logic.Rex Dominator (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Chetniks 3O
Hi Radek, I was wondering if you could express your opinion on the References and Image sections on Talk:Chetniks. User:Rex Dominator apparently believes that an out-of-context quote from an online encyclopedia outweighs seven professional university publications directly contradicting it. He's refusing to accept the sources (and will never accept them judging from experience), he's avoiding discussion on the images issue, the article is full-protected(!) because of this nonsense, and I have no idea how to conclude the matter. Do you think an RfC is necessary or is the 3O sufficient to establish consensus on his objections? How do I unblock the article and achieve an agreement when the person refuses to discuss, and refuses to accept an absolutely overwhelming superabundance of high-quality sources against him no matter what?? -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 12:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Franciszek Przysiężniak
I have nominated Franciszek Przysiężniak, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Franciszek Przysiężniak. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

New article
Radeksz, could you please take a look at this new article when you get a chance?[] and make some improvement if necessary. I personally don't have much experience with the new articles. I think the title should be adjusted also to: Lithuanian cities in other languages. Thanks--Jacurek (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Nobel Prize in Economics
Forgive the frustration in my tone, what what do you mean, 'not again?'. My edit is... not changing any content, just reorganizing the lead section into something clear. The consensus reached on the First Archived Talk page is "Leave the name as is", and I did that. The consensus post acknowledges we should use a "common name", even if 'the common name is incorrect or misleading'. I agree, but that the consensus is that the common name ISinaccurate, I'm just editing the article to reflect the change --kittyKAY4 (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Because you're trying to stir up trouble with the name again, that's what I mean. After not getting your way in the move vote (as can be seen on the talk page). And yes you did change content - removed "It is commonly referred to as the 'Nobel Prize in Economics" and added "inaccurately" (OR).radek (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry but the move argument is a whole other point. The consensus reached is that "WP:NCON says common names, even if inaccurate, should be used", and my edit is in line with the talk page consensus. The removed "It is commonly referred to" was just was because the PREVIOUS SENTENCE ALREADY SAYS THE SAME THING. Content is still there. The inaccurately is mentioned later in the article. The content is already there, just organized differently. I explained my edits on the talk page and I'd like to continue this there. --kittyKAY4 (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Wroclaw
hello :-)

thank you that you wrote to me. how can i write to you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadran91 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Like you just did, or reply on your own talk page. But please sign your comments with (radek (talk) 01:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)) (w/o parentheses).radek (talk) 01:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Level of this Wikipedia
I was absent since April, nothing changed. My comments close several discussions, the same errors in texts. Xx236 (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Nawratil
It is saying that Nawratil is a contributor to the revisionist Ostpreussenblatt and that the IZI is an organization that trivializes the Nazi crimes I have seen the Ostpreussenblatt, it is a second rate right wing rag.--Woogie10w (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Massacres of Poles in Volhynia
this is why i wanted Lvivske to get a slap on the wrist the other time. he just kept a low profile for awhile while he was reported, now he's back to business... Loosmark (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Informal Mediation
A user requested informal mediation for the current dispute at the Paneriai page. Please go here to take part. Please note that in the event you refuse, the end result of this dispute may be penalties for both sides for disruption. Please take part in informal mediation. -- Raziel teatime  19:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I just turned it on. I'll try to see if I can get the other involved parties to wait. I'll let you know either way, and in the case that they don't want to wait, we can try to work something out. Thanks. -- Raziel teatime  20:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Expulsion of Germans after World War II
The article is being rewritten.Xx236 (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)