User talk:Volunteer Marek/Archives/2009/March

Fact tags in Minimum Wage article
I agree with you that much of the tagged material appears in basic textbooks. IMHO that doesn't relieve editors of the obligation to cite their sources, especially in an article as contentious as this one. Good reasons for that are provided in WP:CITE. In the Minimum wage article, I belive it is particularly important to insure that content can be checked, and to guard against copyright violations. Lou Sander (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There's an economics reference called "The New Palgrave," which has some good material on minimum wage. I have access to the 1987 edition, but there's a newer and better one. Do you happen to have access to it? Lou Sander (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Myth of expulsions
What Xx236 tries to say I believe is that From my side-the whole issue also avoids mentioning that milions were actually settled after 1939 and are counted as expelled from Poland-this meaning that colonists sent to Germanize Poland are portayed as victims of injustice by Poles or Soviets.--Molobo (talk) 16:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * People who were leaving on their own are called and counted as expelled
 * People who were evacutaed are called expelled.
 * Jews, Poles are called deported but Germans explelled-which has a stronger emotional meaning.


 * Thanks for the clarification. And I agree with the above. I just think that these are issues which need to be raised in the article's text. But they're not a sufficient reason to change the article title.radek (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Dubingai discussion
Halibutt, after interacting with some editors involved, had this to say: link. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Marelstrom / Federal Reserve
Looks like he's going to be persistent in pushing that tangle of mess. BigK HeX (talk) 01:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for being bold and cleaning up the Fed article. Your version of the criticisms is so much cleaner. BigK HeX (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Clark.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Clark.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Please consider uploading images to Wikimedia Commons instead of en wiki. Otherwise I'll just have to move them one day... ;> --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Labour supply
If you don't approve of the article there at present, then edit it. But to create a second article at Labor supply, overwriting the redirect, is just disruptive. I dropped by to stubsort it, but have reverted to the redirect. Please work on the existing article instead. Thanks. PamD (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Uh, ok, but the previous version of the article is not really compatible with the notion of 'labor supply' as it is commonly used in economics. By standards of modern economics it represents a fringe view, per . The pre-existing text should be moved to another article (I'm not sure what the appropriate title should be since I'm not super familiar with Marxist economics) to make room for an article on labor supply as the term is currently and commonly used in mainstream economics. Also shouldn't we redirect "labour supply" to "labor supply" rather than vice versa, for consistency's sake?radek (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Wacław Micuta page
Thank you Radek for creating Wacław Micuta page. This is great and looks rally good. I always wanted to do it but procrastinated. Thanks again.--Jacurek (talk) 07:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)