User talk:Volunteer Marek/Archives/2009/November

UP again
1. I think we should discuss the pic on the page. Lysy, Faustian, etc. seem to be opposed to it (along with myself). I agree it belongs on the massacres article but not on the UPA page itself for reasons already stated on the talk page.

2. Well I put it back to the structure I had in my 1st post (with the addition on the final figure), so this seems to be in order. In the quote you have on my talk page the chronology is all messed up, bouncing between galicia and volyn, and repeats stuff from the paragraph before.

3. Yeah, I agree on taking it out. I think it can be sourced though ,but the way its there, it's not proper prose. Perhaps it could be added at a later date and put into a proper paragraph, but on its own, without a citation, should be gone. (Unless Pawel got this from mytoka too?)

regards,--Львівське (talk) 07:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * sounds good, but the "realised by Dmytro Klyachkivsky." needs to be reworded. Its unclear. Also, referring to it as "Lesser Poland" is confusing to readers, just stick to the word Galicia, that is, unless it's referring to the environs of Lesser Poland and not just Galicia? But if thats the case, it should be in the other section for ops. in Poland--Львівське (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Chrobry II Battalion
Hello! Your submission of Chrobry II Battalion at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer  Waters  16:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Disregard. Nomination verified. Computer acting up. Missed the last part. Its good to go. Nice job :) Calmer   Waters  16:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Attack on Hrubieszów
Seems DYKable now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I just wanted to expand the part on Jaruzelski' involvement in it and maybe use that as part of the hook.radek (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Attack on Hrubieszow
See here - the article needs a little more work before it is ready for DYK. Ucucha 16:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mass killings under Communist regimes
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mass killings under Communist regimes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Mass killings under Communist regimes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Communist mass killings
Klaus Theweleit's thesis is seriously that. What's more interesting: he manages to sustain it, women, flooding, effeminacy, communism, all related terrors in the German white reactionary's psyche. Fifelfoo (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll take your word for it. It just sounds like one of those "thesis" that people point to when they want to illustrate how out of touch with reality sociologists and psychologists can be. My initial thought was that it was a contrived hoax. But ok.radek (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Its no hoax. Its actually a rather pleasant read, and an insight into early 20th century German middle class and Junker sexual politics.  One guy kept a meticulous daily diary of his life for fifteen years, commenting on hourly minutae.  He mentions his wife once.  Those Hilarious Germans.  Fifelfoo (talk) 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * You've piqued my interest. I might check it out.radek (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Częstochowa massacre
Hello! Your submission of Częstochowa massacre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Aleksander Sulkiewicz
Old news, but I just found it :) Thanks for writing about him; I remembered the event (Piłsudski's escape from the hospital) - and now we have an article about the person who helped him :) That's why I like Wiki :) PS. Re: Chrobry II Battalion - do you care about WP:MILHIST? Also, consider registering for WP:CUP. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * do you care about WP:MILHIST - not at the moment.radek (talk) 21:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Żydokomuna
Hi Radek,

Thanks for your note. I've been following it on my watchlist. I'll respond to the RfC later today. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Mass killings under Communist regimes AfD
I am sorry it was unfairly phrased and I have removed it. The Four Deuces (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. For the Arbitration Committee, Risker (talk) 08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at PD talk
I at no time felt you were attacking me personally. Obviously this matter affects you greatly so I can understand if you get frustrated. Several of the matters we are discussing are boiling down to interpretation (my did not! did so!) comment. I don't believe that opinion gap can be easily bridged. Otherwise I am attempting to show what I think Flonight was getting at. As I am not her, I could be completely wrong. So it goes. 198.161.174.222 (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I can agree with you on the fact that the 'actual' damage was minimal. I concidered putting this on PD talk, but decided your last word on the topic was good enough. 198.161.174.222 (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Odp
O co Ci chodzi? Mamy pozwalać na przekłamywanie naszej historii? W imię czego? Mamy pluć na pamięć tysięcy pomordowanych za niewinność Polaków? Dość stawiania pomników bandytom. Oni mordowali również Ukraińców i nie są żadnymi bohaterami. Cała prawda o czynach UPA, Galizien powinna być w imię przyjaźni polsko-ukraińskiej powiedziana aby zamknąć raz na zawsze ten bolesny rozdział i by się pojednać.--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Poczytaj sobie Motyka - Ukraińska Partyzantka 1942-1960. Całą prawdę się dowiesz. Motyka zmienia zdanie i pisze o akcjach UPA jako ludobójstwie.--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

25 plus
Back then *I* was feeling a little bit brighter about Wikipedia.radek (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Pawel odczep sie od Ukrainy
Czesc Radek, przeczytalem Twoj post do Pawla i musze przyznac ze jestem zdziwiony. Dlaczego chcesz aby "odczepil sie od Ukrainy?" Dlaczego pisanie o Masakrze w Czestochowie jest jak najbardziej w porzadku, a pisanie o Wolyniu juz nie? Oczywiscie, musimy zachowac spokoj i korzystac z dobrych zrodel, ale poza tym to naprawde nie rozumiem dlaczego tak mu napisales. Zbrodnie ukrainskie sa takimi samymi zbrodniami jak nazistowskie, wiec pisac trzeba o wszystkim. pozdrawiam. Tymek (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Sa, ale powinnien uzywac reliable sources i nie bronic do upadlego nie reliable sources.radek (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)