User talk:Von Hintenburg

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Hans Sandrock. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  22:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Dear OlYeller21, Thank you for classifying my edit as vandalism. I removed the two maintenance templates, because they were obsolte, which I mentioned in the edit summary. This article isn´t by far anymore an orphan. In addition it has sufficient citations. I would like to request you to revert your revert of my edit. Thank you. Von Hintenburg (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Your welcome? They aren't obsolete and stating so with your seemingly non-existent experience with Wikipedia is rather interesting to say the least.  The article is still an orphan as defined at WP:ORPHAN.  The article has a single reference and not a single reference placed in line to support the claims made in the article.  I suggest reading through WP:RS and WP:CITE before making anymore requests or accusations. You may also want to review WP:MINOR as the edit you marked as minor, is not.   Ol Yeller21  Talktome  20:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please stop making such personally offending statements like "your seemingly non-existent experience with Wikipedia is rather interesting to say the least". This is according to my view not the appropriate style how to discuss in Wikipedia. Von Hintenburg (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that you're offended by the statement of a fact. With your first editing have 2-3 errors depending on how you count them, I think this is more than a fair assessment. I don't really understand the second sentence.  Are you saying that you taking offense to my statement of a fact is your opinion?  If you're stating that your opinion is that it's not an orphan or that it has enough references, you're simply incorrect.
 * The goal here is to make a good article. For the article to be improved, I have placed the tags to bring in other editors to help place more references and link more articles to the article in question.  Removing them prematurely does not help Wikipedia.  Are your goals different than the goals of Wikipedia?  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  21:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)