User talk:Vontafeijos

 '''Please use the space below to contact me. Be sure to demarcate different topics with section headers and to reply using bullet points.'''

Image:AAfog3.jpg
Please upload your images to Wikimedia Commons.--Saperaud 00:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Serif
I thought we have reached a concensus there, but someone else apparently either misread our discussion or disagreed; and in any case that user did not discuss his changes in the talk page. I wonder if you have anything to comment. Thanks.—Gniw (Wing) 02:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * About the dispute, it is apparently resolved. (Perhaps we have not been careful enough of the wording.) Thanks.—Gniw (Wing) 18:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Heart of Darkness
I've replied on the Talk:Heart of Darkness page. -Wikibob 13:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

AA Mediation Request
Re: ''Ryan, I'd like to take this dispute to mediators. Please respond on my talk page. Please do not remove the citations until the mediation process is resolved. Another option is to ask for a third party opinion, or to ask informal moderators.''

Hi. Wikipedia has precedent for removing disputed material to the talk page while conflicts are being resolved. If you wish to enter the mediation process in good faith, then I ask that you allow the material to be removed to the talk page until the process has reached resolution.

I've consistently argued my case by referring to Wikipedia's standing policies and guidelines. These arguments have not yet been addressed. More than once, your arguments have consisted of claims that explicitly contradict wikipedia's policies and therefore are claims that I reject. I believe that wikipedia's policies and guidelines constitute an objective standard we can use to resolve disputes. Before we request mediation, I believe you should consider to what extent our respective claims are explicitly justified in Wikipedia's standing policy and guidelines as per it's policy and guidelines pages. If you believe I have a misunderstanding, you should say why. I think we should have one last attempt to negotiate before entering mediaton.

If, however, you want to immediately enter mediation then I think we should both list the points of contention, our respective arguments and then we can put up a RfM.

Here are what I believe to be the questions at hand:

"Should disputed material without citations be moved to the talk page?"

"Should a citation that is disputed because it is incomplete be moved to the talk page until a complete citation can be given?"

"When is it appropriate to use a highschool student newspaper as a source? Is it appropriate to use a student newspaper for the claims made in the AA Article?"

Please feel free to add to this list. After that we can list our respective arguments and provide everything to a mediator. --Ryan Utt 03:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I have responded to your answers on my talk page. --Ryan Utt 07:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC) I have responded to your answers on my talk page again. --Ryan Utt 04:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Mouse caused house fire (2006)

 * Help me save this article; its significant and I think you know why. The article is: Mouse caused house fire (2006). The deletion vote page is: Articles for deletion/Mouse caused house fire (2006). Thanks.

Please check out disruptive edits by users Ryan Utt and Dsol on the page Mark Ames

United States article nomination
Thank you for the support in the nomination, but I think you forgot to sign.--Ryz05 t 20:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Jean Grey
You are a beautiful person for putting the Jean Grey entry in present tense. Thank you. --Chris Griswold 08:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you - U.S. FAC
Hi,

Thank you for supporting the recent FAC of United States, but unfortunately it failed to pass. However, I hope you will vote again in the future. In the mean time, please accept this Mooncake as a token of my gratitude.--Ryz05 t 15:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Patricia Madrid
Thanks for that. I noticed you read Mrs. Dalloway--I love Virginia Woolf. And, I noticed you hate Ann Coulter, I mean, I basically love her...but only because she's so ridiculous and unbelievable. I couldn't possibly imagine what she could do next, especially after sending anthrax to newspaper companies.

Heather Wilson
I find your comments on the Heather Wilson Talk page interesting. Contact me via e-mail, please. Dino 13:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Abqtrib flag.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Abqtrib flag.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MovieAuntMay.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MovieAuntMay.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Navigation Boxes for NNAA

 * Hi, I'm contacting you because I see you have made edits to Albuquerque Academy. Some navigation boxes were recently added for the New Mexico Activities Association allowing people to navigate which schools competed with each other.  These templates are now threatened.  Please make your voice heard regarding the NNAA Navigation box issue: .  They have already deleted the Nav box for all of 3A and 4A but these decisions can be reversed.  However, your support is needed.  Greg Comlish (talk) 05:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Vontafeijos! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Neely Tucker -

Fair use rationale for File:Kavitarao.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kavitarao.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)