User talk:Vonteous

March 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Christian mythology is the correct scholarly terminology for this context. —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello. C.Fred, if I may further elaborate when using religious terminology in this context, to proclaim any religion as fictious or as a myth indicates assumptions based upon one's own opinion. To be more scholarly correct means to actually be able to identify the correct use of terms and to understand the full scope of their definitions. So to declare something as mythology is to deter the beliefs of the people who practice a certain belief. Being scholarly, means more than just being academically sound. In this case, "Christian religion" is better suited for this frame of reference. Vonteous (talk) 15:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * You should bring the matter up at the article's talk page to see if there is support. —C.Fred (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have started a section there, and invited Vonteous to argue their case. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Girth Summit  (blether) 15:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)