User talk:Voortle/Archive 1

Odd redirects
I've noticed that you've made quite a few redirects to the page number, and frankly, it seems like it would be extremely unlikely that anyone would actually search for "10000000 (number)," and if they did, the redirect should be to whatever that number is. I'm prepared to either send your redirects to WP:RFD or just delete them outright under CSD R3, but I'll give you a chance to respond first. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 01:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Redirects to outer space
You appear to have created a number of redirects to outer space with names such as White dwarf colonization. These don't seem to relate to the same topic, and therefore it is likely that these redirects will be deleted. Please refer to the welcome page for more information on what Wikipedia is, and how to create and edit good articles. If you continue to create redirects or articles which appear to be aimed at disrupting Wikipedia, this could be deemed vandalism. PLEASE STOP! -- MightyWarrior 12:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not add personal insults to talk pages; do you realise that usernames and anonymous edits can be tracked? -- MightyWarrior 12:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Colonisation of Jupiter
A "" template has been added to the article Colonisation of Jupiter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.c'mon, we've fished a good one.User:Kfc1864Talk to me 10:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Sock Puppet
Are you the same person as User talk:Uranium Committee? Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 16:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Tiddly Tom 16:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

12:00
A template has been added to the article 12:00, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 13:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've deleted most of your additions of number and year redirects from last week, which are clearly repeats (with differenet numbers and years) of those you've done before and had deleted. I'f also reverted your moves of 444 and 888 from "disambiguation" to "number", nominated 12:00 for AfD, and January of 2007 and February of 2007 for RfD. Please don't create nonsense again. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism and AFD on Richard C. Hoagland
The vandalism on the article was completely inappropriate, and your nomination of him just because he's considered a crank is an abuse of the Wikipedia AFD process. The Face on Mars phenomena that he is largely responsible for is, while now known to be really really wrong, quite widely known. We have articles on phenomena like that and people like him because they're historically relevant and important, whether he turned out to be right or wrong.

Please don't do things like this again. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 02:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please do not make undiscussed page moves to less appropriate titles (such as with Twentysomething (term) to Twentysomething (age)) or to titles that are harder to follow (such as moving 2006 definition of planet to Definition of planet since August 2006 and then to 2006 and current definition of planet). Wikipedia has specific guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Ckatz chat spy  15:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to God
I see no evidence that God is widely considered a living person in the traditional sense. As such, I've removed the page from the category 'Living People'. If you believe that he should indeed be classified as a living person, please justify your opinion on the article's talk page. --Algebra 16:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Colonization of Antarctica
I've been working on developing this article further, and I've been trying to work through the various technical proposals for engineering projects. I would be helpful if you could clarify the specific engineers/organizations responsible for the ideas as listed in Elzinga—for example, I've seen record of Buckminster Fuller proposing Antarctic domed cities as early as 1959.--Pharos 21:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

AIV
Hi, Voortle. I'd like to point out that when you make an AIV report, please put * - Your reason ~, or - Your reason here. ~. Thanks, and happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?
I did not vandalize it. Some people consider teens as kids and some don't. I am a young teen, I consider myself and all others under 18 as kids because me and most of my friends don't see our selves as grown-up. We see it as your either a kid or an adult. Even some young adults are refered to as "those kids" by elders. Well, your probobly an adult since you seem so mature, but there is a Nicktoon(If you don't even know what that is: It's any cartoon produced by kids channels Nickelodeon or Nicktoons Network) called Kappa Mikey were one character said "He's an American kid, just graduated from high school". You may have your opinions, I may have mine. But I think that the answer is that an Adolescent is anyone going through puberty. Some say they are kids, some say not. But there is no right or wrong answer. --Mr. Comedian 20:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories
Were you trying to make a WP:POINT with Category:200-299? I've proposed putting it back.

On the other hand, if I read the suggestions in WP:CFD correctly, you shouldn't have merged Category:1 births into Category :0s births yourself, but only suggested the upmerge, and let the bots handle it if agreement is reached. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

WOW
Wow, what's that got to do with it. Anyway, I would consider you to be an adult since you are over 18. So, peace bro. --Mr. Comedian 00:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Well you are legally an adult but I think it's cool that your looking at yourself as more of a late adolescent rather than an early adult --Mr. Comedian 00:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
When editing a page on Wikipedia, please be sure to leave an edit summary. You recently edited List of animals displaying homosexual behavior where you tagged the article with an Article for Deletion tag but didn't state so in the relating edit summary. Thanks. ALLSTAR  echo 18:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem
A tag has been placed on Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; alex.muller (talk • edits) 18:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem
A tag has been placed on Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Guldenat (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem
A tag has been placed on Year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 problem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Guldenat (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Given that the article had already been sent to AfD, it was totally unnecessary to try and include it in another AfD discussion. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Alien spacecraft
Another editor has added the  template to the article Alien spacecraft, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 219 (number)
A tag has been placed on 219 (number) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. EivindJohnsen (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Lifespan of our Sun.
All I'm after is a reference that supports "trillion". Your Google search isn't it. I read the 1st 5 links and none say any kind of trillion for our Sun. Stars have huge differences in ages with our Sun in billions of years (bigger Stars have millions and very small stars are trillions). I have to revert what you are adding as you are not providing a reference in the actual article that supports what Wikipedia says. Sticking references in the talk page isn't where they go. When you add controversial text then you must provide the reference with the text. A google search isn't a reference. The *remaining* life of our Sun is made up of the sum of the various phases though most will just say how many rough billions of years it stays in each phase. In the year 17,000,000,000 (CE/AD) (probably be a Monday - I hate Mondays) thats the end. Ttiotsw (talk) 03:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

The White House
I noticed that you led a requested move in November 2006 to move White House to The White House. I've re-initiated the proposed move, and I have the request on Talk:White House (specifically, Talk:White House). I would appreciate it if you vote on the proposal (with a good understanding of my reasoning). Thanks! Jaxfl (talk) 04:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adolescentilism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adolescentilism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Adolescentilism
An article that you have been involved in editing, Adolescentilism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Adolescentilism. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Formation and evolution of black holes
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Formation and evolution of black holes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * As it is this page is just a copy and paste of a section from the Black hole article. It is not obvious that this article is needed to split of this information. If at a later date it is decided to split of such a section we can always recreate the page.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TimothyRias (talk) 09:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Properties and features of black holes
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Properties and features of black holes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This copy and paste from an old version of the black hole article seems to be none functional. Solving the problems with that article seems to have taken a different direction making this article unnecessary.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TimothyRias (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supernumerary nose
A tag has been placed on Supernumerary nose, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Teapot  george Talk  12:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Numbers
Hi, can I put your subpage on my user page in the same way on another wiki with the same license? (I'll link to your page, of course.) I'm interested in numbers, and would like to make there an article on every number, if I have the time and disposition. I know it's technically in the public domain, but I thought it would be civil to ask you first. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 22:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Supernumerary nose
I have nominated Supernumerary nose, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Supernumerary nose. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Perfection (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Last pool
Last pool, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Last pool and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Last pool during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. WaltCip (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Milestone Wikipedia articles
Category:Milestone Wikipedia articles, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm ArtifexMayhem. Your recent edit to the page Abortion appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a herd of absurd redirects. The thread is Voortle. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I've nominated your latest absurd redirects for deletion. Thank you.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 22:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/AHS (high schools)
I added the AFD header to this nomination for you. You also need to add AHS (high schools) to the top of the remainder of the pages that you are nominating for deletion, as listed in the steps shown on WP:AFD main page. I would also check to make sure that you have the right page, for example BHS (high schools) is just a redirect. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 12:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 249 (number)
Hello Voortle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 249 (number) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 08:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 247 (number)
Hello Voortle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 247 (number) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 08:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 247 (number) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 247 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/247 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (259 (number)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 259 (number), Voortle!

Wikipedia editor Virophage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good Job"

To reply, leave a comment on Virophage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.