User talk:Vorbeireden

Welcome!
Hello, Vorbeireden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Clinical vampirism
Welcome to Wikipedia! In general, blogs do not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Historical information on SCHIZOPHRENIA entry needs to be updated in light of new scholarship
Much of the historical information on Kraepelin, Bleuler, Adolf Meyer (who is absent) needs to be revised and updated with respect to the information in the following book:

Richard Noll, American Madness:The Rise and fall of Schizophrenia (Harvard University Press, 2011) Vorbeireden (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Vorbeireden
 * Hi there,
 * That does look like an excellent book, and the publisher is undeniably reliable, which is excellent. I encourage you to add it to multiple pages!  I notice however, that on the dissociative identity disorder article, you do not include a page number for the book.  If at all possible, it is helpful to readers and editors to include a page number or numbers (or even chapter) using the   parameter of the cite book template.  In addition, this book has a free preview on google books, which can be very helpful for verifying information as well.  You can even link it to specific pages if you know how.
 * I have noticed your edits on some other pages (notably satanic ritual abuse) and have a couple comments that I don't have time to go into right now. One suggestion is that you review our policy on original research, as well as our discussion of primary, secondary and tertiary sources.  Specifically this comment is regarding edits like this, where it says "[Kluft] was open to the validity of SRA reports".  Unless that reference in question actually says "I, Richard Kluft, am open to the validity of reports of SRA", it's a pretty questionable addition that probably falls afoul of our policy on original research.  Note that it may actually say something like this, which would be good, but there is still the question of the amount of weight to give that particular source and statement.  I'll try to look into this more tomorrow.  Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 02:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624409507 your edit] to Richard Noll may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * in his name."

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)