User talk:Vostrom

A tag has been placed on Path Analyzer Pro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Dynaflow  babble  02:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * hangon This link to path analyzer pro was put in the same as its competitors which are already on the page (visualroute).  sure, they're both commercial cousins, but they're also both traceroute tools and one is already in there, why shouldn't the other be?  on one hand, yes you have two commercial tools listed on the page, but on the other hand, only showing one is commercial favoritism and is even less acceptable.  either remove or keep both of them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vostrom (talk • contribs)