User talk:Votezaktaylor

December 2013
Your recent editing history at Lloyd Pye shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * To be fair to Votezaktaylor, we were trying to reach a consensus, though the discussion would have been better done on the talk page rather than in edit summaries. It would have helped us (and Wikipedia) if Lloyd Pye had released the DNA test results for independent interpretation.    D b f i r s   12:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I was not attempting to enter an edit war. There was a claim regarding Lloyd's research that was unsubstantiated, so I changed it, with a citation, and it was reverted back by someone else. So I changed it back to the edit with supporting evidence. In the future I will suggest edits and we can come to a consensus.  This was my first attempt at editing. The article appeared to have a negative slant, I was merely attempting to interject some fact. Votezaktaylor (talk) 16:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)