User talk:Vovim Baghie

Welcome


Hello OrangeStaple, and Welcome to Wikipedia!



Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.


 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Dougweller Good luck, and have fun.

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Onorem♠Dil 00:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:Onorem constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Geoff TC 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Onorem. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Optakeover (Talk)  01:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Why?
why was my correct revesion to Malphas's wikipedia page reverted?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malphas

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Because we require that information comes from reliable and verifiable sources. Dictation from a demon from hell isn't exactly verifiable. --Onorem♠Dil 01:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The Joy of Satan is a verifiable source of information, it is a non-for profit organization in the State of Oklahoma, i think that if it is the line "Dictation From Malphas" that you have a problem with you should just remove that, not revert my entire revision.

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Accident
i was not intentionally vandalising your talk page i clicked the wrong button, and when i tried to fix it i ennded up "vandelising" it again. it was not intentionall

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

why? continued
thats why i posted the resource from www.joyofSatan.org, it is a credible non-for profit organization

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello?
If it is credible sources you want that is fine, i will remove the section "Dictation from Malphas" - it appears the truth is not verrifiable.

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Malphas. Geoff TC 01:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Last Warning?? i just listed a verifiable source, what am i vandalizaing? Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Removed the Line "Dictation From Malphas"
i Have removed the Line "Dictation From Malphas" i see no reason to revert my correct revision of Malphas's descrition

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Last Warning?? i just listed a verifiable source, what am i vandalizaing? Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Personall Attacks
It appears that you people have a problem with me, i am simply rectifying the blasphemous description written about Malphas, i Provided in-depth information, a credible, and reliable source, yet you accuse me of vandalism? it is obvious you are personally attacking me because i am a Spiritual Satanist.

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I disagree with those labeling your edits vandalism, but I also doubt that www.JoyofSatan.org would be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. Please take your concerns to the article's talk page. --Onorem♠Dil 02:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I will Thank you

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

www.JoyofSatan.org
Please tell me why the Organization [established, and Registered] is not a verifiable\Reliable source of Information?

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard would be a good place for that discussion. --Onorem♠Dil 02:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Please just answer my question. even if it is a personal opinion. but thank you i will take it there

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 02:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Onorem Dil
Thank you Onorem Dil

you seem to be the only person with an un-biased opinion, i am sorry for my impatience but this has happend to me many times and i am starting to get sick of it. thank you for bieng the sensible enough to talk to, even with my last attempts in the now [apparantly] banned account S.O.Malphas.

Oh and thanks for sticking up for me regarding optakes decision to label me a Vandelist. Aswell as jake wartenburg's blatant personal attacks [against my last account]

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair eneough
Fair eneough, then may i at least put my description of Malphas on his article page under the Heading "Malphas According to the Joy of Satan"?

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 14:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you understand what Wikipedia is. It is an encyclopedia reporting what reliable and verifiable sources have written about a subject. You need to read WP:RS to understand our own particular criteria for a reliable source. It would help also if you read our policy on original research at WP:OR. Thanks. dougweller (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added a welcome message at the top with lots of links to help you. dougweller (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
I will be sure to read it, may i alt least ask if you would remove the line "Malphas accepts willingly and kindly any sacrifice offered to him, but then he will deceive the conjurer." this is highly blasphemous, and should not be there, because if the Joy of Satan is not credible, why is the lesser key of solomon[ a grimiore] and the words of aliester crowely [a madman] reliable. i do not wish to argue, i would just really appreciate it if you remove that highly blasphemous [and extremely biased] line.

thank you Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 23:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)