User talk:Voyage2000

Your post to Articles for deletion/Kevin Hunter
''Adding to the controversial debate on whether or not this listing should be kept on or not. I think not, this website is mainly to provide information on people who discovered water, and not an important avenue to promote artists or consumer product. Most of the people who provided feedback on this listing did not provide any strength to keeping the listing on, just amateur gibberish, which probably explains why half the entries on this website provide little to no info on the listings. You can find much more information on this stuff by web surfing. The one entry that used BIG words by describing the author as dodgy, clearly has no force, and instead sounds like a bumbling worm. His words had no merit and were instead of an ominous nature. The only thing he did is open the door for a legal suit against the website for posting slander. The other entries went on and on about a so-called ‘vanity’ project, which again has no weight on whether or not a listing is valid, ‘vanity’ or not, as long as it is publicly significant does it have validation. Also the one about anyone can be on Amazon, if anyone can get their work on Amazon then everyone would, that offers no valid debate, the book is apparently listed on dozens of other book sites across the country and as far as Germany, so it’s being sold on more places than Amazon. Also the entry that brings up the positions in film as “Secretary”, this also has no power, another libel entry, anyone who is inside the circle of film production knows the “secretary” position is not what one imagines, and is more the equivalent of the ‘secretary’ in the white house, and not the “receptionist” type role this person thought it to be. Those entries were slanderous and not fact checked. There were two positive entries to be included on here and the rest have no basis on anything whatsoever expect apparent vilification. The only entries having positive basis are the ones stating the author not being yet notable to require an entry at this time and the other one who offered an alternative station on this website for the author to be listed or contribute on. Those are the only two qualified people that should be reviewing entries on this obscure website and the rest should look for another profession for the sake of the website owner.''


 * I've removed your post to Articles for deletion/Kevin Hunter and pasted it above. That page is merely a record of a past discussion and should not be edited.  Also, it is unlikely many people will see your post there since the debate closed several months ago.  The issue was whether the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. He may, but the article did not make that clear.  If you think the subject does meet those requirements, then you can rewrite the article, but make sure his notability with respect to those guidelines is made clear (preferably in the few two sentences).  Best of luck. ×Meegs 22:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack
I don't know what you're upset about, but you need to understand that personal attacks like you made on my Talk page are not permitted on Wikipedia. - Tverbeek 14:51, 5 April 2006 (UTC)