User talk:Vrenator/2013 Archive

please stop removing red links from List of software products
What is your measure of notability for BPM software products? Handysoft Bizflow and IBM Lombardi are cited a "strong performer" and a "leader" in Forrester Research's canonical review of BPMSs. See the abstract here:. Bizagi and Bonita aren't even covered by Forrester. If you have something against red links then create the articles, but please stop removing the legitimately listed items. Keitsist (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * If these items are legitimately listed then why not cite your sources rather than just putting in red links to non existent articles. Lombardi did have an article which was deleted as not being notable Articles for deletion/Lombardi Software. If there is no measure of notability then the article will end up being filled with thousands of non notable packages. To quote your own page "In God we trust; all others must cite sources"  Vrenator     talk   10:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to read my user page. Please see the source that I cited for that row a long time ago: List_of_software_products. Forrester Research appears to be considered somewhat of an authority in the field of enterprise sw. Gartner's opinion is very similar. As Lombardi is now a product of IBM the 2008 article deletion is academic. Keitsist (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I added extra Gartner cites, for you. Keitsist (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

About Celteeka Software
Dear Vrenator I would like to know why have you erased my entry 'Celteeka Software' as well as 'Cruise ERP' in the 'List of ERP software packages'. Thank you in advance.

Regards, Sebastian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastian.ricaldoni (talk • contribs) 17:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The 'List of ERP software packages' is for items which are notable (have a Wikipedia article). This is explained in the edit summary.   Vrenator     talk   09:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Infrared
Hello Vrenator.

"Infrared" in the Wikipedia.

A part of the first paragraph reads:

Infrared (IR) light is electromagnetic radiation with longer wavelengths than those of visible light, extending from the nominal red edge of the visible spectrum at 0.74 micrometres (µm) to 0.3 mm.

Well, I think the value of 0.3 mm is wrong.

In a webpage, http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/infrared-radiation.html

I have found the following: "... infrared radiation, electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength in the range from circa 75 × 10 - 6 cm to circa 100,000 × 10 - 6 cm (0.000075–0.1 cm). ○..."

I think the right value should be 1 mm.

Also, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary,

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infrared

says about Infrared:


 * situated outside the visible spectrum at its red end —used of radiation having a wavelength between about 700 nanometers and 1 millimeter.

Cordially,

Alejandro Ochoa G., 189.162.204.139  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.162.204.139 (talk) 06:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I don't know much about this subject. I suggest that you put you comments on the article's talk page or you can make you own changes as long as you ensure they are correctly referenced.  Vrenator     talk   09:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Elgin
Sorry about that! I thought I was in sandbox. Thanks for your help. 216.124.22.11 (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Merkel
Hi, there was no vandalism, see Merkel (surname), please. Its common to have own articles like that, see Schmidt (surname) and Schmidt. Jón +  16:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Apologies, my mistake- I've reverted it back and removed the warning. Vrenator     talk   16:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

aadi
Why are u deleting the content of the aadi he is my favourite avtor that is already in correvt processs don't need to edit it and who ru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venky547 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I reverted it because it was unsourced and unencylopaedic. Vrenator     talk   16:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Why have you removed information about Pat McDonagh?
Do you not know about the religion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.46.116 (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

USNS Red Cloud
You undid my deletion for the USNS Red Cloud. I was a crewmember on that vessel for nine years. We were not a ghost prison and have never held prisoners.

Frontaccounting - let me understand better what's inappopriate, and how to correct it
Hello Vrenator,

I see you reverted my edits to Frontaccounting page saying "Reverting back to before addition of unsourced promotional material". I'm a user of Wikipedia for longer time, edited so far from time-to-time anonymously finally created an account, so seeing other article with similar "tone" I assumed "it should be OK"...

Nevertheless - want not to repeat mistakes, so please let know how "unsourced promotional material" concern relates e.g. to my edit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frontaccounting&diff=543943219&oldid=543883732 (one on the Documentation section)

Regards

Wts2000 (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Deprod of Frontaccounting
I have removed the prod tag from Frontaccounting, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

Wts2000 (talk) 00:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Notice of WP:AN discussion
Hello Vrenator, this is notification of a WP:AN discussion regarding an editor you have dealt with. The thread is: WP:AN. Appreciate your input, thanks! 18:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Error in Working
Hello,

I didn't make any change in "Simultaneous equations: Difference between revisions". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.138.186.136 (talk) 06:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The edit in question was done from the same IP address that you are using in December 2011. The best way to ensure that you only get your own messages is to set up a user id and log in.  Vrenator     talk   14:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

mistake
cars emmission are presented for any car production company in grams/ liter not in grams/km. Is a big big mistake to show emission in grams/km. I think you are not engineer and please modify the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.93.238 (talk) 21:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I've not done it, believe me
Hi. I'm the user of the IP address in which you sent a message i.e 115.250.15.211, I saw you messaged me regarding undid of article named Optical phenomenon (here) i.e

''' Hello, I'm Vrenator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Optical phenomenon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Vrenator     talk   10:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)'''

But believe me, I have not edited anything else in that article you mentioned, I even don't know that such article exists. Surprisingly I saw that the editing exists as I saw it in this page here

But can you tell me that is it possible that someone can use my IP address and browser internet to edit articles even if I'm using 3G Dongle which is protected with a strong password which couldn't be changed ? I'm sure this is the first time happening in my life so I'm currently confused. Himanis Das talk  16:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)