User talk:Vrennie


 * I would advise reading Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest. Can you explain how, if unblocked, you would edit in a manner that would not contravene that guideline? -- Kinu  t/c 09:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I have read the COI article, and I understand the concerns you have. Although I work for the company, the purpose to update the website was to update the information so that it is factual and up to date. I understand Wikipedia is a site meant for neutral articles, so I simply intended to be informative on what IPI is and how it works. The information that is currently displayed does not represent the changes that this company has evolved to and my employer would like that information fixed so that it is not misleading. As a company, we do not seek out clientele as we have the majority of potential clients in our field familiar with our company or members already. We simply market for the clients, not ourselves. This was meant to allow us to be adequately represented in a factual sense on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia has a reputation for displaying false information, as the admins cannot possibly know what is truly correct information on sites like this one (the primary reason schools do not allow Wikipedia as a form of reference for school assignments). That being said, while you have the right to deny me access, your repeated reasons for blocking me from correctly editing this page does nothing but promote another site with misleading, false information - thus adding to the lack of credibility for Wikipedia. For that purpose, I do not believe it would be in the best interest of the company to keep this page up with misleading information. I will allow the time period to expire on the deletion notice you have placed.