User talk:Vreswiki

Spam
Pls read over External links. -- Moxy (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Video does not work for the majority of readers...its got a copy restriction to it. I am not sure where you live (USA I guess) but most cant see it..thus is not a good link.... perhaps we could link https://archive.org/details/AdolfHitlerTheGreatestStoryNeverToldFull6HoursDocumentary instead.  YouTube blocks content where necessary to comply with local laws...thus its a bad link. -- Moxy (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Addendum: Please note that I've removed the external link you added to Rape during the occupation of Germany. It's a spammy blog site, so take note of Moxy's advice, plus familiarise yourself with what reliable sources are, and what types of external links are not considered to be viable. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Vacation9. I noticed that you recently removed some content from India–Mongolia relations with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vacation 9  22:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent because it did not adhere to the Manual of Style. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Thanks for removing the Voice of India publications, as it is not a mainstream publisher. However, we would appreciate if you maintain the citation style currently in use, including the alphabetical order. Otherwise, you would create more work for the rest of us.'' Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=662374937 your edit] to Ancient Greece may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * //www.sdstate.edu/projectsouthasia/upload/Megasthene-Indika.pdf Indica]" work by Megasthenes (Ambassador of Greek King Seleucus Nicator to India)(304 B.C)

Edit Warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war on B. R. Ambedkar page. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Human 3015  talk • 04:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you revert at B. R. Ambedkar. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   07:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Vreswiki, you have already exceeded 3 reverts in a 24-period and you can blocked from editing. This is obviously not the way to go. Please study WP:BRD and practise what it recommends: open discussions on talk pages instead of edit-warring. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Criticism of the Bible because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Orders for the demolition of Jagannath Temple, Puri, passed by Aurangzeb.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Orders for the demolition of Jagannath Temple, Puri, passed by Aurangzeb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Demolition of the Kashi Vishwanath (Banaras) Aug 1669, ordered by Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Demolition of the Kashi Vishwanath (Banaras) Aug 1669, ordered by Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Many problematic edits
Vreswiki, I have had to revert several of your edits on wikipedia for violating numerous policies, for example: Given the number of previous warning messages on your talk page, and the numerous problems listed above, it is likely that you will be blocked from editing wikipedia soon unless you mend your ways and start following all the relevant policies. I'll drop you a welcome note below so that you have easy access to the policy pages. Highly encourage you to read and follow them, if you wish to continue editing here. Abecedare (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Demolition of the Kashi Vishwanath (Banaras) Aug 1669, ordered by Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.jpg that you uploaded claiming to be your own work is in fact a derivative of the information at aurengzeb.info
 * The material you added to the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India was a cut-and-paste copyvio of bnpmindia website
 * You added books published by voiceofdharma to the further reading sections of numerous articles. Barring a few exceptions (such as on wikipedia articles about the authors of these books), these publiscations are not reliable sources on wikipedia. If you need a confirmation about this just ask at the India project noticeboard or reliable sources noticeboard (or, just search their archives since I am certain that the issue has been discussed before).
 * More generally, Further reading sections, if they exits at all (ideally these references should be incorporated into the article), should list only the best and most comprehensive sources on the topic, and for history and related article those will usually be sources that comply with WP:HISTRS
 * Question Can you clarify where you obtained the image File:List of Invasions of Assam by Various Sultans.jpg from, since it doesn't appear to be your work? In any case the image is unusable on wikipedia since it makes unverifiable claims.

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Antisemitism. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. VQuakr (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Advice
Hi dear user, You have been reported on admin's noticeboard of vandalism by another user. You may not know these things because you are new. Your talk page(this page) is full of warnings. If you continue whatever editing you are doing then you will get blocked permanently sometime in future. Moreover you IP address also can be blocked. In such cases you will not able to edit Wikipedia from your laptop/PC and it will became useless gadget for you. If you think that your edits are valuable for readers then kindly use talk pages to discuss it. It seems you never use talk pages. You can see option "talk" on you upper left corner of the screen of any article, then you have to click on option "new section" and you can start discussion on your desired issues. And its not like that your changes will not get accepted. There is 80% chances that your edits will be accepted if you go by proper channel. No one owns Wikipedia articles. You have all rights to edit Wikipedia. You should take break of 2 days and learn some basics of editing. Otherwise you will get blocked forever sometime in future. -- Human 3015  Say Hey!! • 21:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your additions
Hi Vreswiki. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I see that you have been focusing on adding material to the External links and Further reading sections of our articles. Most if not all of your edits have been reverted, because the items you are adding are not suitable for inclusion. Please find another way to contribute. You might consider having a look at some of the helpful links in the section marked User talk:Vreswiki a little higher up on this page for ideas on how to improve your editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Vreswiki, despite the advice that I and User:Diannaa gave you you have been adding more non-reliable blog links as further reading sections to numerous articles (examples from the last few minutes, , ,  etc), without any attempt to explain or discuss your edits. This is getting disruptive and continuing in this vein is likely to get you blocked from editing wikipedia. Abecedare (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Nambi Narayanan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thomas.W talk 18:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Final warning for adding trotally irrelevant external links on multiple articles, and adding unsourced content and commentary. Thomas.W talk 18:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220  of  Borg 19:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Abecedare (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:List of Invasions of Assam by Various Sultans.jpg


The file File:List of Invasions of Assam by Various Sultans.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused table. Can be replaced with wikitext when needed."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 06:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)