User talk:Vrghs jacob

Copyright block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I have blocked you indefinitely, as it seems to me at this point that we cannot trust that you will comply with our copyright policies. In spite of a prior block for this issue and an ongoing WP:CCI evaluating your contributions, less than an hour ago you pasted text from into Parliament of India, including (but not limited to) the following: "The centre and focus of the building is the big circular edifice of the Central Hall. On the three axes, radiating from this centre are placed the three Chambers for Lok Sabha (House of the People), Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the erstwhile Library Hall (formerly the Princes Chamber) and between them lie garden courts." The source says: "The centre and focus of the building is the big circular edifice of the Central Hall. On the three axes, radiating from this centre are placed the three Chambers for Lok Sabha (House of the People), Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the erstwhile Library Hall (formerly the Princes Chamber) and between them lie garden courts." I do not believe that you should be unblocked without some strong reason to believe that you both understand our copyight policy (including the amount of rewriting necessary to escape creating a derivative work and intend to comply. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello. I've read your e-mail, and while certainly it's all in order (and much more encouraging than your last note after your block), I am not comfortable discussing unblocks of this nature off of Wikipedia. If you wish to appeal your block, please do so here through the unblock template which will provide an opportunity for a different administrator to read over your reasons and consider whether you can be trusted with another chance. On the occasion of your first block, which occurred on ongoing issues a full month after your WP:CCI was opened, you were told very clearly here that your account would likely be indefinitely blocked if you continued. I told you then, "You must not copy and paste content; if you cannot put it into your own words, you should not contribute it." Your unblock request really should explain why, in the face of a clear warning and explanation, you continued to copy and paste content and why, since you did so, we can feel confident that you would not do it anymore if you were unblocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * (Incidentally, unless I am misreading your e-mail, you seem to suggest that you are still "unofficially" editing Wikipedia; if that is the case, please stop until you have negotiated an unblock. Editing through another account or IP while blocked is also a policy violation that may make it more difficult for you to officially return, if it is discovered. An indefinite block is not necessary permanent, but may be lifted at any point once we are convinced you are no longer a risk. Evidence that you are violating other policies may make it harder to convince administrators of that. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC))



Note to reviewing admin: Ten minutes after this request, this user resumed editing without logging in. --jpgordon:==( o ) 01:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Michigan–Flint
Template:University of Michigan–Flint has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 🎓 Corkythe hornetfan  🎓 00:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)