User talk:VroomanGL

Deletion Review of Brody Ruckus
Hello! I would like to remind you that Deletion Review is not Articles for Deletion. We do not discuss at DR whether something is notable or not, but whether the article was deleted out of process or not. Due to the lack of sources and apparant non-notability of the subject, the administrators that deleted the article believed the article qualified under the appropriate criteria for speedy deletion (A7). I also noticed that you have not edited Wikipedia since April when you vandalized an article about a town in Michigan. Before you start to, let me remind you not to troll this deletion review. Let people present their arguments and let process take its course. Thank you. --ZsinjTalk 17:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Purple Earth hypothesis


The article Purple Earth hypothesis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dicklyon (talk) 15:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)