User talk:Vrrajkum/Archive 1

October 2015
Hello, I'm Capitalismojo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Socialism because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:V and WP:OR your efforts to insert opinion and unref'd material is disruptive Capitalismojo (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * User TFD has requested editors vote on the socialism talk page on what the scope of the article should be. I suggest you take a look: - Battlecry  08:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I award you The Worker's Barn Star!
Thank's for your work on the socialism page. You are appreciated. Magnus bjerg (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Accidental deletion of over 16,000 characters of text.
Vrrajkum: On 29-NOV-2015 you made this edit but it appears you accidentally deleted over 16,000 characters of text from the article without explanation. I have corrected the problem but please be more careful when editing articles and always leave a clear and detailed description of your edit (beyond the default provided by Visual Editor) in the Edit Summary. Thank you. Koala Tea Of Mercy ( KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations ) 06:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please use the Edit Summary field
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

Moving or copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Socialism into Socialism (economic system). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syro-Palestinian archaeology
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syro-Palestinian archaeology. Legobot (talk) 00:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources
You added a reference to the lead of Confirmation bias, a Featured Article. Unfortunately, that book is by VDM Publishing who are notorious for copying their books from.... Wikipedia. That was a circular reference. See WP:ALPHASCRIPT and WP:PUS. Check Google Book hits carefully before using them as a source. Fences &amp;  Windows  00:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I was not aware of VDM's reputation, but wanted to add that I was the one who originally added the sentence "It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning." from VDM in 2014 (I did not have a Wikipedia account back then). VDM did not copy that sentence, at least, from Wikipedia, if that's what you are suggesting. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * VDM is also the source that I used to rephrase the lead sentence from "favor information" to "search for or interpret information", also in 2014. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course you weren't aware or you'd not have used the source. This is how they make money out of buyers, especially libraries - they dupe people. Yes, VDM did copy it from Wikipedia and you using VDM as a source merely reinserted old wording originally found in Wikipedia itself. See this old version of the article from October 2009, for example. Please don't use VDM/Alphascript/Betascript books as a source. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I see. My mistake, thanks for letting me know. Vrrajkum (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church. Legobot (talk) 00:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oldest people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of oldest living people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of oldest living people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stevie Boi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stevie Boi. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song). Legobot (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=718561763 your edit] to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * year=1998|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-52255-7|page=106|author=Robert F. Barsky}} [John Dewey], Nelson Goodman, Zellig Harris, Hebrew literature, {{cite web|author=

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=719221388 your edit] to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * {{red|&#123;&#123;}} Infobox scientist

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=719699271 your edit] to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Noam Chomsky|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst :REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * * [Uppsala University]

Late ping
Notifications from discussions (pings) do not work unless added in the same edit as a valid signature. Thus this edit did not produce a notification. ― Mandruss  &#9742;  23:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

DS alert: Donald Trump
You commented in the discussion about whether to use ISIS or ISIL. Four hours later, having received no reply there, you modified the article per your viewpoint on the matter. That is not how it works, especially at an article under the ArbCom remedies. I would suggest that you self-revert and continue to participate in the discussion. ― Mandruss  &#9742;  18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I have (I think) reverted all of this edit. Again, please do not make edits to content under discussion. ― Mandruss  &#9742;  22:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Out (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out (film)
The article Get Out (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Get Out (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Prologue to Covenant
Your edit for this from this morning was reverted on Alien: Covenant. Start Talk on the Talk page there if needed prior to edits. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Why do you feel that the Michelangelo statue should be mentioned? It's true, but to me it seems like an excessive degree of detail for a plot summary. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The reviews in the Critical reviews section of the article by Edelstein and Wilkinson are both in agreement as to the depiction of David as a Frankenstein monster in the film, Wilkinson even compares him to "Satan" in her review. The only hint the film gives of this level of malevolent behavior in David early in the film is his choice of King David, the King of Israel, as a role model for himself. That seems notable as an indication of the extremity of David's malevolence which appears later in the film and as summarized by Edelstein and Wilkinson. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Reversion thanking
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you.

AzCoy7 (talk) 03:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)