User talk:Vshustov

September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Physical fitness has been reverted. Your edit here to Physical fitness was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6blW1Vjkvs8&list=PL_W970DePe7FfFg-5d8L6-mum3mK9uZ_5&index=1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It is me who uploaded the mentioned above external link to YouTube. However, I would not mind to remove it (if you believe it does not comply with external links guideline) while restoring the image itself. Hope it will be no violations now. Best!Vshustov (talk) 08:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

= Does anybody here dislike my recent real man contributions? = I do not mean, actually, the female contributor Deli nk. Thanks!Vshustov (talk) 01:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked this account because it is clearly the same editor as the already blocked account Shustov. If you wish to edit Wikipedia, please request an unblock with that account. If you do return to editing, please refrain from the unacceptable sexist remarks such as those right above. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Ed, for communicating with me like a normal human being in contrast with the mentioned above Deli nk. By the way, if you kept in mind the words "female contributor" from my above communication dated 01:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC) while accusing me of "unacceptable sexist remarks", please look at the very first user box of Deli nk and you may find out who is a real sexist in this case. Besides, you avoided answering my above question, namely: "Does anybody here dislike my recent real man contributions?" Therefore, I assume, that there is nothing wrong with those contributions (see ) and the only problem is my already blocked account Shustov which, apparently, discredited my account Vshustov. It's no good, of course, but to my defense, I need to present you the following information: 1) Due to my personal reasons, I could not participate in any Wiki projects activities for about a year or even more and simply did not know what was going on there. 2) When, recently, I made an attempt to resume my other, not blocked Wikis activity, my User name:Shustov, unfortunately, was not accepted and, to log in, I had to become formally a new User:Vshustov. In many cases, like in Wikipedia Commons, you may find indication that Vshustov is the same account as the former Shustov. Due to foregoing, what you believe shall I do now?Vshustov (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I really don't understand much of what you are trying to say. I don't see how Deli nk has communicated with you (or anyone else) in an inappropriate way.  And you seem to be accusing her of being sexist merely because she identifies as female, which makes no sense to me.  In any case, there are clear problems with your edits.  Nearly all your additions have been reverted by multiple different editors (which, of course, has nothing to do with one of them being female).  Because the images you are adding don't seem to relate well to the pages you are adding them to and because these images are apparently of you, it certainly comes across as if you are here merely for self-promotion.  Your previous account was indefinitely blocked for that reason and because you have returned with a new account to do the same thing, I have blocked this account as well.  If you wish to request that another uninvolved administrator review this block, you may do so by adding the following template to the bottom of this page:    I hope this helps.  Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I am trying to say the following: 1) Deli nk, for example, without any discussion undid my inclusion of the image below Physical fitness exercise for seniors-1.gif into the article "High intensity training" just calling it "extraneous distracting moving gif"(?!). Who are the victims of my "extraneous distracting movie gif", by the way?? - Sorry, but to illustrate the topic, this unique animation is the best in the public domain now. If you are able to prove the opposite, you are welcome to call me "self-promotional". 2) For my using the words "female contributor" from the first user box of Deli nk, it was just you who accused me of "unacceptable sexist remarks". Why??Vshustov (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)