User talk:Vtalks

Re: Raheja Developers
Re: your message: The article is currently semi-protected from editing and the current state of the article seems reasonable upon review. Is there some specific issue/editor that you want reviewed that has not already been addressed? Please provide diffs so that I can understand exactly what you wish me to look at. If you have issues with a particular part of the article as it exists, you should bring up the issue on the article talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Re your message: I reviewed the article's edit history and I do notice a pattern of trying to remove cited material regarding issues with the company. As for your specific inquiries, citations 22 and 23 refer to the Cobrapost investigation and previous citations establish a link between Raheja Developers and the Cobrapost investigation.  Citation 26 is referring to the DDA.  For citations 19 and 32, blog sites can be reliable sources in certain circumstances.  Merely being a blog does not immediate invalidate it from being used as a source.


 * I do not understand why you brought up issues with this article to me as I have never edited the article or been involved with it as far as I remember. I will repeat my suggestion that you bring up any issues you have with the article on the article talk page, use the dispute resolution process, or bring up specific issues on one of the appropriate noticeboards like: Dispute Resolution noticeboard, reliable source noticeboard, or the neutral point of view noticeboards.  The first step would be to discuss the issue on the article talk page.  Because this is a content dispute, I will not be making unilateral edits for you without proper consensus.  I see no need for administrative action, either. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)