User talk:Vucien

Hello

Don't revert my edits again
I understand that it's not necessary to keep every scene intact. But atleast keep necessary events and parallel story arcs. Because a story can't run with just protagonist. Parallel leads, negative leads are equally important part of it. So in cast section. And please use after marriage surname for married women. Or if you don't want to keep parallel leads story in main plot section then add parallel arc section as it happens in many shows like Ye Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai. Here Samar, Nandini and Kinjal's characters are parallel leads. So please don't revert my edits again and again. It's my humble request Pra2310 (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

You need to stop adding unnecessary details. And no married name is not compulsory for women. Vucien (talk) 04:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

I requested you to not remove atleast necessary e. But you think any show runs just because of leads. No. It runs because of everyone. And I'm myself a girl. I understand that it's not necessary to add after marriage surname of girls. But if it's so important then every other show do the same thing. That they add after marriage surname of girls. And I said if you don't want to add parallel leads story in main plot section then add a separate parallel arcs section as happens in many shows. Because parallel leads are pillar characters of show. So please don't revert my edits again. Pra2310 (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

You revert my edits again and again. I asked you to make a parallel arc section if you don't want to include parallel leads story. But you revert it again and again. But I add because I found parallel leads story necessary as no story can't run without parallel leads. Even Lord Ram needs his brother Lakshman Ji and Lord Krishn his brother Balram Dau ji. As they're parallel leads and important part of their stories. So either don't revert my edits again or add a parallel story arc section like in many other shows. Please it's my humble request to you. Pra2310 (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

If you don’t stop adding unnecessary details, I will report your account. This isn’t fandom wikia, it’s Wikipedia. Frivolous and detailed plot doesn’t belong here. Every character has an importance but if we keep mentioning everybody’s storylines, it will be a mess. Vucien (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

so add parallel arc na. As I earlier also said the same that story can't run with just lead. Even on wiki also. Even I can report your account for reverting my edits again and again. But no I'll not do this. I even asked you to add parallel arcs as in other shows. But you do what you think. I just added important storyline. You even minused section between divorce filing and resort episodes. But much happened between these 2 events. Which is necessary to mention. So please don't revert my edits again Pra2310 (talk) 10:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

This isn’t a slam book. You need to understand that only concise and summarised information goes up here. It does not matter if “much happened between these 2 events” The plor section is not for detailing but outlining the main plot. Vucien (talk) 10:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

3O on Anupamaa
Hello Vucien, While you are correct that most of Pra2310's additions are fancruft, their claim regarding the terms "Baa" and "Baapuji" are correct. They are not nicknames, they are rough equivalents of the English "Nana" or "Granny". I believe they should either be mentioned as such or omitted entirely. I'll leave it to you. Cheers! 2405:201:4013:80F4:1DB:51CC:DE38:6D55 (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Logging out of your account to defend yourself anonymously is stupid. No need to do this. The terms are mentioned like that because that is how they are called by most characters. Everyone knows it’s not a nickname. Vucien (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Your assertion that I am Pra2310 is incorrect. This is not the first time I have been suspected of logged-out editing, but I have been editing as an IP for >5 years now. Special:Contributions/2405:201:4013:8000:0:0:0:0/52 is one of the ranges I have used that I am aware of. There are numerous others. Secondly, if you see Pra2310's talk, you might notice I have given them a fair share of warnings and notices. Lastly, if you've read WP:SIGNS, you might also realise that there is almost nothing common in our editing patterns. Please assume good faith before randomly throwing around accusations. 49.36.176.132 (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Anupamaa edit-war
Wikipedia's ideal approach is called WP:BRD. You Boldly make a change, but when it's Reverted, you start a Discussion on the article talk page. Discussions about article edits are often best on the article talk page as other editors can find them much easier than on a random person's talk page. The edit-war you were involved in on Anupamaa could have resulted in a block for you (and probably the other editor) as you went past the WP:3RR limit. A similar message will be left on the other editors talk page, but this is about YOUR actions. Continuing to hit the revert button over and over will often lead to a block. Please don't revert quite so much, discuss more. This is a warning about exceeding the three revert limit. Read the WP:3RR page and understand that continuing to edit-war will be reported to the editwar noticeboard.  Ravensfire  (talk) 12:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Adding the same promotional copy to Harshad Chopda. Are you a paid editor?'' Atlantic306 (talk) 23:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

No, I’m not. If adding reliable resources and re-adding content as per Wikipedia rules is paid editing, then I have nothing to say.
 * Pinkvilla is an unreliable source and the content is promotional Atlantic306 (talk) 02:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

What about the rest of the reliable sources I added? Are you going to ignore those and keep reverting them? And the only reason I added Pinkvilla was because it was an interview article. The career section as per Wiki rules should include the characters, the actor’s preparations and comments on their characters, sourced show information and the awards the actor wins. That’s exactly what I added. But you keep reverting it claiming it to be promotional and paid. How are people supposed to add awards and achievements if you guys keep doubting it to be paid? I’ve seen plenty of actual promotional edits where fans add personal opinions and puffery to hype up actors. THAT is promotional and incorrect as per Wiki rules. Merely stating actual achievements is not promotional.

November 2021
Vucein why you engage in edit war with everyone. Not only me but others also. The person who did edit to Anupamaa before your edit were really constructive. But you always removes other's contributions. If you find it unsuitable weather it's my edit or someone else's edit first come on talk page to resolve the issue. You're invited on my talk page to resolve your edit issues with me. But please before reverting back someone's edit to previous version please try to resolve the issue by coming on talk page. Pra2310 (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Warring
Recently you have reverted good edits, including some of mine, in Anupamaa, Imlie and Barrister Babu. One of your edits to Barrister Babu today restored an unsourced addition that I had recently deleted. Other writers have already confronted you about reverting their edits. Your behavior is disruptive and hostile. Stop it. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 16:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Anupamaa characters with reference to Sreemoyee characters
Your assertion that I add Samar's character in main cast list just because I'm Paras Kalnawat bhai and Anagha Bhosale fan is totally wrong. I add this character with reference to the main cast list of original series Sreemoyee. There also Pratyush Sengupta aka Dinka's character played by actor Saptarishi Maulik sir, the younger son of protagonist Sreemoyee is kept under main cast list. Even you update 2 worst shows of Star Plus Ghum Hai Bhabhi Ke Pyaar Mein I mean Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein and Imlie also. So do I. And Yrkkh also which has also become a remake. As almost all shows of Star Plus are remakes right now of popular and hit Bengali and Tamil/Telugu/Malyalam series. So I update main cast list in every series according to that not because I'm fan of someone. Even I hate Madalsa Sharma for defending Kavya offscreen and Neil and Aishwarya for defending Virat and Pakhi offscreen. But still I add Aish's name because Pakhi's character is in main cast section in Kusum Dola also. Similarly Malini's character in Imlie's original version. Pandya brothers and DILs in Pandian stores. If I would have been AnaRas's such a big fan then I would have changed words like boyfriend girlfriend to fiancé fiancée in their characters. Even I don't do experiments with Jethalaal Gada's character in TMKOC even after being show and Dilip sir's fan since childhood. And I'm currently working over Sudhanshu sir's draft to make it real article again. So please stop your assumptions. As I've seen you adding repeated stuff to Harshad sir's article too. And I suggested you to first come on my talk page to resolve your issues with me rather than just reverting back my edits and other editors edits too on their talk pages. We'll gain nothing by warring. Even you added 2 plots-Anupamaa leaving home and Anuj's confession of his unrequited love even before they came on-air. Only promos and precaps were released at that time. So stop adding plot before it actually comes on-air and stop assuming that I'm someone's fan that's why adding their names in main cast list. I just do with reference to original series of each show. Pra2310 (talk) 11:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

It is more than evident from your edit history that you are a fan of the actors that play Samar and Nandini. The puffery and promotion is more than evident. Your claims make no sense because cast section is not based on original series cast section. The original series is NOT the exact copy of Anupamaa. Samar is NOT a main character in Anupamaa. It doesn’t matter if that character was main in the original series. You never follow Wikipedia rules and have the most illogical defense. As for plot, once the promos come out, it becomes official. So check your edits before commenting on others. Read Wikipedia rules and then edit. Vucien (talk) 17:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh really. You always make wrong assumption for others. I agree I did mistake in Yrkkh by adding love-interest word. But I'll not agree with the fact that I made edits on Anupamaa because I'm fan of Paras Kalnawat and Anagha Bhosale. If I've been such a big fan of SaNan then I would have made a parallel lead section in cast section like someone did for Mayuri Mam's character Malini in Imlie. And you're calling me as fan and the one who violates Wikipedia rules. Then what did you do?? Your edits on Harshad sir's article lead you to be assumed a sockpuppet account by an user. Even I'm his fan since childhood as I watched him as Cadet Ali Baig in Left Right Left. And visit my talk page first. You'll understand that I've been involved in edit war with you because you doesn't listen to anyone. From Shivangi Joshi to Jiya Shankar to RadhaKrishn to Capitalisation in Wikipedia I rectified my mistakes by accepting them. But you you even doesn't accept your mistakes if other editors (not me) point them out. Nor replies. You just think yourself to be best. I've seen your whole history. You engage in edit war with every other editor and accuses them of being wrong by making false assumptions. Even you made false assumption about someone that it's me. And no plot is added till the time it originally arrives. You said both were official promos that's why they must be included in plot before they arrive. But many promos were misleading too. Story related to those promos never arrived. Like Streedhan promo and Mrs. Vanraj Shah promo. So will you add plot without realising that if it's real promo or misleading promo?? And Anupamaa leaving home was audience voice. And a new promo got released few hours back in which Samar was making Anu realise that she should respect Anuj's love and never lose him as a friend which is also audience voice that Anu should respect Anuj's love and not consider his intentions wrong and not lose him as a friend atlest. I know it'll come because Saas Bahu aur Saazish and Saas Bahu aur Betiyan segments already gave sneak peek to it. But it should not be included until it really arrives. Sorry to say but your behaviour of making false assumptions for everyone, engaging in edit war with every other editor by thinking your edits best and doesn't listening to others instead accusing them due to your false assumptions defines that you're bound by your ego. You're lucky that even after accusing me of doing edits due to being someone's fan by your false assumptions and you yourself doing same thing I didn't lose my cool on you. Otherwise I can't tolerate those people who falsely accuses me by making false assumptions for those things which they themselves do. Please think logically before making any assumption for any editor and discuss it with them on their talk page instead of reverting their edits and accusing them. Even I'm not interested in any war. Because it can lead both of us to be blocked for few hours to few days. So end this issue please and discuss your issues with me on my talk page before reverting my edits. And do same with other editors also. Pra2310 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Dimpletisha&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Dimpletisha. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. clpo13(talk) 02:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)