User talk:Vugar69

Signatures
Please sign your talk page messages at the end of the messages. See wp:SIGHOW. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:kelapstick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 20:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 21:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Newcomer, Didn`t know rules, please Unblock

 * I'd like to offer my two cents: the user actually knew the Wikipedia rules well enough, and being affiliated with Nobel Oil Group, which has extremely high Wikipedia editing activity for over a year now, he knew enough to go to several talk pages, from users to admins to admin board, to write his allegations and provide various links. This requires a degree of sophistication, knowledge and skills. So to claim now that user Vugar69 didn't know what he was doing is a bit disingenuous. Redzed9876 (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed.  Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 20:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Vugar69 (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Two cents are disruptive and have got teeth. Rahmatold (talk) 20:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)User should be unblocked. Redzed9876 - campaigner

Vugar69 (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)It is not multiple accounts by one. it is using one internet access by different individuals. Is it still sockpuppetry?

On Wiki rules
Vugar69 (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Oil_Group Section - Controversy and criticism- "Several independent media outlets in Azerbaijan, Romania where is evidence? and elsewhere where is evidence? have raised question where is evidence? on the actual real ownership and beneficiaries of the company, since they are concealed where is evidence? from the public eyes. Despite getting multi-million dollar government contracts and choice pieces where is evidence? of oil and gas blocks in the Caspian Sea, the shadowy where is evidence?[22]dead Nobel Oil Group has a non-transparent ownership structure and its relationship with the Azerbaijan government is unclear. [23]dead [24]dead[25]dead"

This part of Controversy and criticism were created by Redzed9876 and still exists up to now. Does it go well with Wiki rules?


 * Removing talk page access seems appropriate, for a sockmaster.  Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 22:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Vugar69 (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)What about freedom of expression on my own page, Mlpearc ?