User talk:Vuvar1

Polish Wikipedians' notice board
Zapraszam.--Witkacy 09:02, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hipokryzja
Kiev jest po rosyjsku a Kyiv po ukrainsku? Dodalem na jego stronie linka do wypowiedzi - co do hipokryzji, to wlasciwie standard miedzy adminami :) Mnie tez ignoruje, ale trzeba wiercic, Ty tez sie dopisz do niego na strone, czym wiecej ludzi tym lepiej, bedzie zmuszony na odpowiedzi--Witkacy 09:34, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Co do Hrodna Province, jezeli masz jakies dane o ludnosci polskiej, to wrzuc tam do artykulu - przydala by sie tez gdzies wzmianka o nagonce na polonie, ktora prowadzi rzad bialoruski.
 * Co do szablonu, tez mi troche nie pasuje naglowek, ale jest tam wymieniony Popiel, Siemowit etc. ktorzy byli.. no wlasnie kim? :) Moze cos w stylu "Rulers of Poland"? Ale w sumie chyba nie musimy byc az tacy dokladni - "Kings i High-Dukes" moim zdaniem tez moze byc.
 * Jako odzielny projekt to raczej nie przejdzie (obecne projekty od dluzszego czasu dosc powolnym krokiem prna naprzod), ale mozna w to-do-liscie wstawic na poczatek 3/4 wladcow do obrobki.--Witkacy 22:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * No tak, masz racje. Chodz to by bylo raczej skierowane przeciw Lukaszence, a nie narodzie. Fajnie ze sie wzieles za naszych wladcow, bo malo kto sie nimi ostatnimi czasy interesowal.--Witkacy 00:12, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Tego bym sie sprzeciwial, Poniatowski jest uwazany za ostatniego krola Polski. Technicznie rowniez Mikolaj i Aleksander nimi byli, jednak ten szablon sluzy jedynie do nawigacji miedzy artykulami. I nie widze potrzeby by ich tam umieszczac.
 * Zobacz co ten Nohat napisal na swojej stronie dyskusyjnej... szkoda slow na takie osobniki.--Witkacy 15:45, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Polska nazwa z glownego artykulu o miescie byla skasowana, a on dodaje do dzisiejszych dzielnic Szczecina - nikt nie chce dodawac "Kijowa" do dzisiejszych dzielnic tego miasta.--Witkacy 17:39, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wyobrazasz sobie by Litwini lub Ukraincy dopuscili by wstawiac polskie nazwy do osiedli Wilna i Lwowa? Bo ja nie :) I moim zdaniem ani niemieckie nazwy nie powinny byc w artykulach o dzisiejszych osiedlach polskich miast (bo co osiedle sloneczne ma wspolnego z Niemcami?), ani polskie w artykulach o dzisiejszych dzielnicach Wilna czy Lwowa.--Witkacy 17:55, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Co do tabelki, uwiez mi ze to nic nie zmieni, ta nagonka przez niektore osoby (ze tak powiem) trwa od dawna - przeczytaj to. Zobacz tez Stanislaw August Poniatowski w ktorym jest wstawiona tabelka "Preceded/Succeeded" (ja wstawil jakis Anglik). Ogolnie mozna by bylo rowniez do "glow panstwa polskiego" dodac Hans Franka ktory zarzadzal General Government :) sa wymienieni tutaj nikt prawdy historycznej nie ukrywa, jednak byli troche "innymi" krolami Polski, jak krolowie do Poniatowskiego

Jesli chcesz cos napisac na temat zachowania kolegi przy ostatniej dyskusji, to zapraszam tutaj.--Witkacy 20:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jak juz Balcer napisal, ta meta byla napisana przez Polaka by w ironiczny sposob pokazac zachowanie wobec polskich uzytkownikow na ang. wikipedii :) Co do arbitrazu, w pelni sie z Toba zgadzam - ale powiem Ci ze polowa adminow z ktorymi mialem doczynienie nie wiele sie od niego rozni... Ten black book widze jako pierwszy krok by zaczac sie z takimi rozliczac... (chodz nawet jak udowodnisz dla prosiaka ze jest swinia to odwroci kota ogonem ;) )--Witkacy 22:08, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A nie mowilem co do historii z prosietem? Kolega przyszedl i skasowal czarna ksiazeczke bo mu sie nie spodobala i sie plul ze go atakuje :)--Witkacy 23:12, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Przemyśl
Ukrainian name is "Перемишль" Ilya K 07:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Książęta
Czołem! Skoro już zajmujesz się uzupełnianiem listy książąt, to może byś spróbował użyć tabelek, jakie stworzyłem do tego celu? Ładniej to wygląda w tabelce niż jako prosta lista. Polecam List of Polish rulers i Dukes of Mazovia. Halibutt 18:40, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

How to deal with Poles
How to deal with Poles to żart, napisany zresztą przez Polaka. Radzę czytać z większym poczuciem humoru :). Artukuł jest dobrą parodią niektórych antypolskich reakcji na Wikipedii. Balcer 21:52, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Kyiv_gerb12.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kyiv_gerb12.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Kremer Prize
What a surprise! We're very glad to hear you again Vuvar1. And thanks a lot for info about Kremer prize. Do you know some more details about? 4C 21:26, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

pl:Wiki

 * Ja w relacjach międzyludzkich niestety (albo stety) nie wierze w obiektywną prawdę. Każdy ma swój POV a "NPOV" to suma (zbliżona czesto do sumy algebraicznej) tych punktów widzenia :) Radomil talk 20:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ukrainian Oblasts

 * Thanks for your note. I will cross-post it to talk:Zhytomyr Oblast and will respond there. Regards! -Irpen 02:54, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)

Samaritan
You're welcome. --Briangotts 29 June 2005 20:22 (UTC)

Buddhist temples
Please explain to me why soto zen temples are not buddhist temples, and why you've changed their category. Thanks.

--Defenestrate 2 July 2005 17:27 (UTC)

Samarytanie
Hej, Vuvarze, miło cię spotkać i zobaczyć. :-) Ja, jak wiesz, przeżuwam jeszcze gorycz porażki wyborów na ciecia. Słusznie zrobiłeś, że wypłynąłeś na międzynarodowe wody. Ale widzę, że ciągnie cię do polskiego lasu. Chętnie zajmę się tym artykułem o samarytanach. Pozdrawiam. Togo 4 July 2005 18:08 (UTC)

Anti-Polonism
Moglbys dac glos na zostawienie - Votes for deletion/Anti-Polonism dzieki--Witkacy 4 July 2005 22:21 (UTC)

Wikiportal/Ukraine
A project Wikiportal/Ukraine created by several editors is now live. I am sure this topic is of interest to you. Cheers, --Irpen July 8, 2005 22:08 (UTC)

Nice one
Thanks for Image:Stalin'sbody.jpg, good stuff. Alf melmac 21:13, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Bad licensing
I'm sorry...The blackpool image isn't applicable for GNU, I think it may even be copyrighted. I found it here. Nou Uiserr

Halibutt's RfA
I would like to express my thanks to all the people who took part in my (failed) RfA voting. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! I was also surprised by the amount of people who stated clearly that they do care, be it by voting in for or against my candidacy. That's what Wiki community is about and I'm really pleased to see that it works. As my RfA voting failed with 71% support, I don't plan to reapply for adminship any more. However, I hope I might still be of some help to the community. Cheers! Halibutt 05:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Deletion of 'liberal wikipedians' category
Hi. I saw you're (like me) listed in this category which is up for deletion. Hoped you'd like to vote in favor of keeping it... Thanks! Larix 02:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Jasieński
Czołem! Jakiś czas temu zauważyłem, że do notki o Brunonie Jasieńskim dodałeś informację że był też poetą rosyjskim. Czy rzeczywiście kiedykolwiek napisał coś po rosyjsku, czy to raczej kwestia miejsca zamieszkania? Halibutt 19:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Zen priority tag
It's back. Sorry. Andkaha(talk) 14:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Samaritans
English description of the pictures that appear in the article about samaritans in the Hebrew wikipedia: Sorry for poor English... Yours [Freddie Mercury http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%A9:Freddie_Mercury]
 * A Samaritan priest with a Torah scroll.
 * The Samaritans kiss the place of the Binding of Isaac on Mount Gerizim.
 * Samaritans from Holon on the top of the Mount Gerizim. The Holoni Samaritans has wear not only fez, but also another hats.
 * Samaritan boys residetns of Mount Gerizim (Samaritan neighborhood) in their synagogue.
 * A desk above a door of samaritan house that they use like mezuza.

Image Tagging Image:Shomroni tora1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shomroni tora1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 00:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I changed the tag and gave the source in this article. I hope it's OK now. Regards! V1t 18:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I looked at the original image, and I'm not sure that the tag given is equivalent to PD-self. My Hebrew isn't very good, but it looks like an education-only license to me, or something like that.  PD-self means that the author claims no rights whatsoever to the image, and allows anyone to use it for any purpose: commercial, noncommercial, with or without attribution, etc. If I'm correct that it imposes restrictions other than attribution and "copyleft", the license isn't allowed on any Wikipedia, whether English or Hebrew, except under fair use.  No Wikimedia Foundation project is supposed to be accepting license terms more stringent than the GFDL, cc-by-sa, or similar licenses; restrictions to educational-only, noncommercial-only, or Wikipedia-only are explicitly prohibited by edict of Jimbo Wales. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 05:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Are you a Brahma Kumaris?
Vuvar1, Hello, are you a Brahma Kumaris? If so will you be participating in the current discussions or will you BkSimon continue to speak on their behalf. Please advice. TalkAbout 21:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Iosif_Nadejda.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Iosif_Nadejda.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Kamil Radulij
See Redirects for deletion/Header. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 12:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Gerb lugansk1.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 17:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gerb_harkov_obl1.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Gerb_harkov_obl1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Wolfgang Gerhardt.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:800px-Wolfgang Gerhardt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nv8200p talk 04:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:800px-Wolfgang Gerhardt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Wolfgang Gerhardt.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wolfgang Schaeuble CDU.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wolfgang Schaeuble CDU.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. doco ( ☏ ) 15:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC) --doco ( ☏ ) 15:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:GrbBanjeLuke.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:GrbBanjeLuke.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 22:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Flag zhitomir.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Flag zhitomir.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Unia Demokratyczna.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Unia Demokratyczna.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Stalin-Molotov.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stalin-Molotov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn 13:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

You Tram Pics
Hello Vuvar1,

Jusdts wondering if i can use your pics at http://en.trams.wikia.com. I will assume it is ok, but if it is not please let me know and I will remove them.

Thanks,

 BG  7   13:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot!
 * I was aware that they were PD, but I though it courtesy to ask!
 * If you're interested please feel free to pop over!
 * Thanks,
 *  BG  7   11:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I presume you mean Blackpool?
 * If so, then yes please! Especially if you can get any of the 2008 new liveries (Balloons in Metrocoastlines variations and the Baloon in the Automedon Green and Cream advert... sorry, the number elude me atm!)
 * Also any images from elsewhere would be great!
 * Thanks a lot, it's really appreciated!
 *  BG  7   12:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:ZhukovStalinMaus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ZhukovStalinMaus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Stalin'sbody.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stalin'sbody.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens .rf 14:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Deal Hudson
I did not know this. Could you provide a source, please? Thanks. David in DC (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Be warned, that source could be viewed as not in compliance with WP:RS.  It a self-published post on blog.  I'm content to leave it, since it's not derogatory.  But others may take a more conventional view.  Cheers, David in DC (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Double thanks. I've sorted through the five you provided and chosen two.  Wikified them too.  And conformed Hudson's title to the source for that fact. Cheers, David in DC (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Ki-43-23s.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ki-43-23s.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:RanakpurJainTem.jpg
File:RanakpurJainTem.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ranakpur.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * File:300px-Rola-Zymierski.gif is now available as Commons:File:Rola-Zymierski.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

rollback
I have granted you rollback. Please read our policy and be careful with the new tool. Happy editing and rollbacking. John Vandenberg (chat) 14:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

e-acute
Sorting is a cultural issue; there is no universal sorting. The rules for sorting of some languages conflict with the rules for other languages. In English, the cultural rules are (among many other things) to sort on the English alphabet, A-Z. Accented letters (and ligatures) don't exist in the English alphabet, so must be converted to an appropriate equivalent. See WP:MCSTJR, the third line. Studerby (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Ger
Martin Heinrich Hammitzsch (born 22 May 1878 in Plauen, Dresden - died 6-12 May 1945 in Oberwiesenthal) - German architect and Adolf Hitler's brother-in-law. Hammitzsch was the son of the architect Heinrich Hammitzsch (1852-1910) and his wife Anna Hammitzsch nee Kohlsdorf (1854-1938).

He was educated in elementary school and real school for masons and carpenters in Dresden. From 1894 to 1898 he studied at the Royal Higher Vocational School in Chemnitz in Chemnitz where he received a bronze prize medal and a travel grant from the Böhriger Foundation. From 1898 until 1901 he studied at the Technical University of Dresden. He graduated as engineer in the field of architecture.

He was briefly as an assistant to Cornelius Gurlitt and afterward undertook numerous study trips in 1902 He visited many places in Germany, Denmark, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. After those trips he started to work independently. He worked as a teacher of civil engineering at Baugewerkschule in Nuremberg where he got his PhD in 1904 for the work "The development of the modern theatrical architecture".

In 1905 he went back to Dresden, where he worked as an architect and was a teacher of civil engineering. In 1907-109 he planned and supervised the tobacco factory "Yenidze" in Dresden. Yenidze was the first fully concrete industrial building in Europe. In September 1909, after the controversy over "Yenidze" (he was temporary removed from very conservative Saxonian architects' association), he moved to Chemnitz, where he was awarded the title of professor on 18th May 1918. Martin Hammitzsch married Marie Johanna Hynek in 1912.

He volunteered in the German Army from August 1914 until January 1919 and he served in 22nd Engineer Battalion. During the war Captain Hammitzsch was awarded the Iron Cross 1st Class and the Iron Cross 2nd Class and the Royal Saxon Albert Order 2nd Class.

In 1917 he and his wife bought a house in Oberlößnitz (now part of Radebeul) which he named "House in the sun" (Weinbergstraße 44) in 1920. In 1920 he came back to Dresden and lived lived in "House in the sun", which (in 1920-1921) enlarged and redesign according to Heimatschutz architectural design. From 1922 to 1933 he was German National People's Party's member of the local council of Oberlößnitz and from 1933 till 30th March 1934 a member of the board of directors of Radebeul's community. In 1935 he joined NSDAP, and participated in it's rallies.

On 20th January 1936 he married Adolf Hitler's half-sister Angela. At first Hitler did not accept the marriage and did mot attend the wedding; latter their relations improved. In 1937 he sold "House in the sun" and moved to Dresden (Comeniusstraße 61).

In 1938 he became the head of the Building Department in the Saxon Ministry of the Interior. In 1939 he was appointed director of this department. From 1937 to 1943 he was a reserve officer in the army; he retired as a Colonel. In 1943 ? he take charge of the Technical Department of the Saxon state government.

He committed suicide in May 1945 because he was afraid being tortured by the Russians.

excluded from the very conservative Saxonian professional association of the architects cigarette manufacturer Hugo Zietz (1869-1927) had been sent of owners specially into the Orient, in

The then young Martin Hammitzsch, who only completed his degree in architecture in 1901, was commissioned as architect. After a period of freelance work, he was appointed as director of the Dresden State College of Architecture in 1920. Later he distanced himself from his youth.

He tried to get to the Sudetenland and committed suicide probably on 6th May 1945 in the forest near Oberwiesenthal. His body was found on 12th May. His property was confiscated on 30th October 1945 by the Soviet Military Administration in Germany.

Buildings

 * 1907-1909: Cigarette Factory Yenidze, Dresden
 * 1910: Administration Building for the Electricity Association Gröba, Gröba district in Riesa
 * Grammar School Chemnitz
 * many villas and residences

Writings
Mann zieht sie nach Radebeul in die Weinbergstraße 44 ins »Haus an der Sonne/ «44 (»Haus an der Sonne«). 1937 verkaufte Prof. Hammitzsch sein Haus in Radebeul und zog mit seiner Frau nach Dresden in die Comeniusstraße 61.

http://www.das-neue-dresden.de/gauforum.html

Maurice Frydman
Dear Vuvar1, Could you please email David Godman? He is very interested to learn more about the references you added to the Maurice Frydman article (for some research he is doing). His email is david_godman at yahoo.co.uk Thanks! Iddli (talk) 14:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Vuvar1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Willigis Jäger -
 * 2) Pero Bukejlović -
 * 3) Dragan Čavić -
 * 4) Wolfgang Gerhardt -
 * 5) Martin Bangemann -
 * 6) Niko Lozančić -
 * 7) Ali-Reza Pahlavi -

CfD nomination of Category:Jain Acharyas
I have nominated jain acharyas for renaming to jain acharyas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Maria Kaczyńska
Hello Vuvar, (Konnichi-wa Vuvar-san), I see you have 'corrected' the place where Maria Kaczyńska was born. Are you certain this is correct?
 * 1) Was Machów, Lublin Voivodeship definitely wrong? I can't read the source in Polish(?) (I read write/English only!) An English source or translation would be fantastic!
 * 2) The actual place name is not linked, just a 'nearby' place called 'Narach (village)', which you have under it's former name of Kobylnik. Can we link the place name directly?
 * 3) The birthplace reference lacks data such as author, date of article, publication, publisher, date published etc.
 * This (5. ^styl.pl) or (6. ^prezydent.pl ) is what it looks like now. The English language webpage is also available, but it seems to have less 'sections' than the Polish one, (both versions seem to have more information about the pets then they do in the persons biography!) But if the data is on the English web page (which is already reference № 1) we really need to link directly to that, if possible.
 * This ( 1. ^Biography: Maria Kaczyńska" (in English). Republic of Poland. 2010-04-10. Retrieved April 10, 2010. ) is more like it could/should be, if possible. Can we do better than ( 6. ^prezydent.pl )?

Any other additions you can make are most welcome. Your sources are probably much better than mine!. Almost forget to give condolences on this terrible event! I hope it does not lead to worse relations with Russia! (We Australians lost (only) our Prime Minister Harold Holt in 1967 when he dissapeared while swimming in heavy surf.) Thanks for your attention!. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Got you message Vuvar1 and the references are much better now, I appreciate your work! Thank you! Maybe we need to say Maria Kaczyńska "was born in a tiny village that no longer exists". I assume it was because of World War 2 that it is gone? Again, my hopes for the best possible conclusion to this tragedy. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Concur with your last message re the village. If we aren't sure it still exists, or was incorporated, with references it stays out! Thanks! --220.101.28.25 (talk) 04:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Gerb lugansk1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gerb lugansk1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jasienskibr1.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Jasienskibr1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Grizim archiology3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Grizim archiology3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Flag lugansk1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Flag lugansk1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Gerb harkov obl1.png
Thank you for uploading File:Gerb harkov obl1.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:53, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Places connected with Jainism
Category:Places connected with Jainism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:790px-Uschhorod oblastnarada.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:790px-Uschhorod oblastnarada.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Stalin-Molotov.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stalin-Molotov.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bielecki1.jpg


The file File:Bielecki1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Patton grob.jpg


The file File:Patton grob.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BlackpTramOra.JPG


The file File:BlackpTramOra.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned for over a decade, no description of what the image actually depicts, low quality photograph"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 03:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)