User talk:W5nio

Welcome!
Hello, Jackpaylor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jack Paylor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:QRZ.COM, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:QRZ.COM


Hello, Jackpaylor. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "QRZ.COM".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlantic Airlines (United States)


A tag has been placed on Atlantic Airlines (United States), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bronson Burgoon


A tag has been placed on Bronson Burgoon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited QRZ.COM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MIR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of United Airlines Flight 102 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Airlines Flight 102 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 102 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/J.Paylor
I have closed your RFA as WP:NOTNOW. There were a number of technical problems with it and it was never transcluded to the RFA main page -- therefore no one saw it. Aside from these issues, candidates are expected to have thousands of edits and sometimes years of experience before applying for RFA. I suggest you read WP:RFAADVICE if you choose to run in a year or two. Additionally, WP:ORCP is a place to vet your candidacy to see if you're ready for run. Regards, Mkdw talk 18:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WoodsEdge Community Church


The article WoodsEdge Community Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article does not assert the significance of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ethanlu121 (talk) 23:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vail Arson Attatcks 1998
Hello W5nio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vail Arson Attatcks 1998 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Woodstop45 (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Study.com
Hello W5nio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Study.com for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 15:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your GA reviewing
W5nio, while your enthusiasm is understandable, you passed three articles for GA today in the course of eight minutes. It is clear that you do not understand the GA process or its criteria at the present time. Just because you think an article is good, that does not mean it meets the specific Good Article criteria.

I would urge you to get a great deal more experience at Wikipedia; with 186 edits, 28 of them deleted, you have quite a ways to go. Try to get an article to the point where you can nominate it yourself and see, from an experienced reviewer, how the criteria are applied in a GA review. For now, I have to ask you to refrain from attempting any more GA reviews, since they are not valid and will all have to be undone. Thank you for your cooperation. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saltgrass Link System
Hello W5nio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saltgrass Link System for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Alvaro Molina ( Let's Talk ) 14:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saltgrass Link System


A tag has been placed on Saltgrass Link System requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Praise Break
Please reference reliable sources. Xx236 (talk) 06:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Study.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Study.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Study.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 23:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sky Sudberry


The article Sky Sudberry has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable golfer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GoldenRing (talk) 06:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Reconstruction Era
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reconstruction Era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 06:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, a few notes on this. In the article I see several paragraphs that have no citations. I also see paragraphs that end with uncited states (this essentially means are uncited?) While it's not necessary to place a citation at the end of each line, GA does require inline citation, so I would not want to leave statements without clear citation, for example at the end of a paragraph, and I certainly think every paragraph will need a citation. I'm very willing to work on the article with you to improve it as much as possible, but I will be honest and say up front that passing it this round is going to require a lot of work. Would you be willing to consider submitting it to peer review or GOCE? — I think the lede, especially, would benefit from a thorough and full copy edit. Because of the length and breadth of the article, it will be a little more challenging to write a lede that will meet the 1b criteria. Seraphim System ( talk ) 21:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Reconstruction Era
The article Reconstruction Era you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Reconstruction Era for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Paylor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Paylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jack Paylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Jack Paylor Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jack Paylor Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Praise Break


The article Praise Break has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "One non-RS citation"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bricksmart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bricksmart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bricksmart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wolfson5 (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sky Sudberry


The article Sky Sudberry has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per WP:ONEEVENT. Appeared as a child in a film but no other indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Montgomery County, Texas Sheriff's Office
Hi @W5nio, I found your article about the MCSO. I am going to try to bring it into the mainspace. It seems you have not been active on Wikipedia recently, but if you are interested please let me know and we can improve this article together! Regards, Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 23:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Update: this article is now in the mainspace! Montgomery County, Texas Sheriff's Office ~ Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 18:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)