User talk:W656411

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 14:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Wikipedia topics related to hiding have become more opinion based rather than fact based. Wikipedia needs to prevent this from happening W656411 (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't know what you mean by "hiding", but your edits to Black Lives Matter were unsourced, your opinions, and reverted as contentious. You need to use the talk page of articles before adding such edits if you don't want to be banned from the topic area. And we depend heavily on interpretations by reliable sources. Doug Weller  talk 13:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aunt Jemima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

The lead summary material is well-supported in fully-sourced sections. In particular, you removed: "The Aunt Jemima character is based on the enslaved "Mammy" archetype. Since its debut, the character has been criticized as an example of exploited African American women. "Aunt Jemima" is sometimes used as a female version of the derogatory epithet "Uncle Tom" or "Rastus"." --William Allen Simpson (talk) 21:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indigenous Peoples' Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aunt Jemima, you may be blocked from editing.

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

None of the edits made were disruptive. The removed polarization and politicization of controversial topics. The person that should be banned is the person who keeps undoing the edits. Please review. Thanks W656411 (talk) 07:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC) William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You were edit-warring to insert your opinions into long-established articles and remove sourced content because you disagreed with it. That is disruptive. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You twice vandalized Aunt Jemima this month, and you had been previously warned about vandalism on that article.

This is incorrect. I edited pages to remove the author’s subjective opinions. Wikipedia deals with facts and subjective information. These authors inserts their own, very warped viewpoints into neutral topics. The edits were to in-politicize their subjective and false, misleading information. These edits should be reverted. W656411 (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)