User talk:W727

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Also please see the Three-revert rule.--agr (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

When across several articles your edits are being reverted by several different editors, you need to consider that there is indeed a problem with the content you are adding and that you should not be reverting their reversions. Please take heed of the good advice ArnoldReinhold gave above.Teishin (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 15:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   17:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Quantum mysticism
Please note that this is considered quantum mysticism as well as synthesis (WP:SYNTH) using WP:PRIMARY sources. Such beliefs and foreknowledge claims, when notable, can be mentioned in relevant articles, but they should be interpreted in the way independent reliable sources do... For instance, if other encyclopedias don't mention it (those are WP:TERTIARY and useful to determine what is important to cover), it's likely WP:UNDUE for Wikipedia. Moreover, we cannot present those like if they were facts in Wikipedia's voice. — Paleo Neonate  – 21:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Such WP:PRIMARY papers are not really usable in Wikipedia articles. If you would like to pursue a discussion about the topic itself on Wikipedia, I recommend the Science Reference Desk but doubt that it would lead anywhere. The WP:FTN discussion was not fruitful and persistent WP:PROMOTION could eventually lead to sanctions (I posted here since editors of the noticeboard call to close the thread). I don't know if this applies, but if you are the author or know the author personally, per WP:COI users with a conflict of interest should clearly WP:DISCLOSE it and avoid editing about themselves, friends, company, etc. If there are other topics that you would like to edit about, I highly recommend it (and it would be an opportunity to demonstrate general interest in the encyclopedia). — Paleo Neonate  – 14:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

How to sign talk page posts
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 22:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)