User talk:W7KyzmJt/Archive 1

Your GFDL question
Greetings. I answered your question at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights All the best, – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 21:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: um...how exactly do you play?
Peep.

statue of liberty picture
I' m glad that you like the picture. Feel free to use my picture of the Statue of Liberty embellished by golden sunsetand with credit and don't forget to forward me the link of your website I would like to see you! Geographer 09:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

You could simply go by my wiki screen name User:Geographer, thx. Geographer 21:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Today's featured article
Tobacman 00:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

IP block
Hi there! Thanks for your message.

The blocking administrator wasn't me: I was just the one who reduced the block from full to anonymous only to prevent collateral damage.


 * 19:55, 9 October 2006 User:Redvers blocked "72.14.194.31 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 727 hours (please log in if you wish to edit, thank you)
 * 19:54, 9 October 2006 User:Redvers unblocked 72.14.194.31 (contribs) (Collateral damage; will reblock AO)
 * 03:00, 9 October 2006 User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me blocked "72.14.194.31 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 744 hours (please log in if you wish to edit, thank you)

You'll need to contact User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me about the block.

Thanks! ➨  ЯEDVERS  07:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

If you want to change your username...
Hi. I saw on your userpage your comment that you don't want to be "User:WindowsWizard12" anymore, but you also don't want to delete the account and start over. Pardon me if this is obvious, but are you familiar with Changing_username? There is the ability to change you to a new name of your choice while retaining your contribution history to date. Hope that might be helpful. Newyorkbrad 05:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No I wasn't familiar with that, I'll check it out. Thanks. Robert 13:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Google Web Accelerator
You do not need to disable it wholesale, only for this website. See No open proxies for an explanation why. --  Netsnipe  ►  03:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Rename
As requested, I have renamed you as User:W7KyzmJt. You should now move your userpages to the new name. Warofdreams \'\'talk\'\' 00:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Account
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thepresident1

Brakspear
Hi there. I'm wondering why you reverted my change to Infobox Brewery? Mike Dillon 04:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It was probably a mistake, since I've been reverting vandalism with some automated help that may have flagged your edit as vandalism, though it puzzles me why I didn't catch that it wasn't. Anyway, sorry. Robert 04:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. Mike Dillon 05:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi!
Maybe I can help...what are you trying to accomplish with Template:Peurile? -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  05:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

The reason I asked was that you posted it to User talk:85.154.20.244. It looked like you were trying to warn him about his little vandalism spree; I just wasn't sure what template you had in mind! If you want to just get rid of Template:Peurile, the quickest way is to add to the top of it. That template says "Oops! I created this page by mistake.  Could you delete it, please?" -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  05:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

speedy deletion for Template:Puerile4
I don't agree with the proposed speedy deletion of this template. It is a warning to users who have committed serious vandalism to articles that is probably "divisive and inflammatory" in itself. -- Robert 05:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Regardless of how vitriolic the vandalism committed by a user to whom a warning is issued, warning templates should be written in civil language. Describing a user's edits as "puerile" borders on a violation of No personal attacks, and is entirely unnecessary in any case, as template:blatantvandal is quite adequate for warning users who commit serious acts of vandalism.  Nonetheless, if you disagree with this proposed speedy deletion, you are welcome to add  to the template, and to describe why the template shouldn't be deleted on its talk page. John254 05:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand that policy, but I don't think that describing vandalism as "puerile" constitutes a personal attack. Under No personal attacks it states, "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks." -- Robert 05:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Describing vandalism as "puerile" might not actually amount to a personal attack. Indeed, I've seen editors use stronger language in their reports on WP:AIV.  However, the language employed in templates placed on user talk pages is held to a high standard of civility, since the templates will be issued to a large number of users.  A description of vandalism as "puerile" could be seen involving a user's personal character, by asserting that the user is "puerile".  In any case, there is no need to employ this term in a warning template, as the term "unconstructive" employed in template:blatantvandal is quite serviceable. John254 05:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree that it might be seen to involve a user's character (and even if it did, a user that committed the type of vandalism that would warrant this template is in my opinion most likely a puerile person) but I suppose the other template serves the template. -- Robert See Hear  Speak  06:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Robert, on a completely different issue, you might want to choose a different color for "Speak"; yellow isn't readable on a white background. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  06:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, now is this color better? -- Robert See Hear  Speak  07:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's better; the orange is still a bit hard to read (low contrast with the white background). -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  07:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

User inquiries
I've been wondering, and since you're an administrator i thought i might ask you, what's an easy way to check how many edits a user has and how long their account has existed? Thanks, -- Robert See Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  00:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Robert!


 * I'm probably the editor on Wikipedia who cares least about edit counts (they just don't measure anything useful IMHO) but I think most people use Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool for general edit counts.


 * As for when an account was created, for users created after (I think) December 2004, if you go to their logs (User page > User contributions link > Logs) there's a log for "User creation". More useful, perhaps, is first edit date - to find this, go to the contribs and click "oldest". At the bottom of the list is the first edit they made.


 * Hope this helps! ➨  ЯEDVERS  19:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, that's what i was looking for. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  21:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * No worries :o) ➨  ЯEDVERS  21:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the "Nonsense"
Oh no, thank you good sir. However, that particular event is of great importance to the school. It would be a shame to have it removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesserlights (talk • contribs)
 * Forgive me if I am wrong, but I don't think your edits (1, 2) qualify as encyclopedic, even if true. If you continue to vandalize pages in the manner you have, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  02:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Reversion of edits
Earlier you reverted these edits here and. I was wondering if you had any particular reason why because I was following the Citation templates format and updating the article. Personally I don't see any reason why these edits were reverted and would like to know why they were changed because in my point of view those edits expand on the citations used and follow wikipedia policy. SirGrant 01:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh I just read your thing at the top, if you could respond on my talk page that would be preferable. Thank you SirGrant 01:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sincere apologies. I did not intend to revert those edits. I'm not sure what happened but what seems most likely is that I was trying to revert this vandalism (using User:Lupin's Anti-vandal tool and User:Gwernol beat me to it, and for some reason the tool did not alert me that someone had already reverted it. Anyway, sorry about that. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  01:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool cool, don't sweat it. I've had the exact same thing happen to me when I was fighting vandels.  Glad we could get that cleared up :) and good hunting!  SirGrant 05:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

what's your problem
hey man, what's your problem. Stop vandalizing pages. Janechii 15:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't know what you're referring to. I've never, ever (purposefully) vandalized a Wikipedia page since joining two years ago (or, for that matter, before that). Please send me the link to the change you're talking about so I can sort this out. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  22:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

myg0t notability
Hi, while I appreciate the efforts expended by editors like you making sure that non-notable subjects remain off wikipedia, the myg0t page was created only minutes ago, before I had time to add appropriate references detailing the notability of the group. I again thank you for helping, but do you think the article could have a bit of time to develop and establish notability before adding the tag? Please continue discuss any issues you have regarding the subject on the myg0t talk page. I hope you don't mind me removing the nn tag until the issue is discussed further? cacophony ◄► 04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, sorry if I jumped the gun a bit here -- I've had some experiences with articles about online boards/forums/groups etc. in the past that 99% of the time turn out not to be notable, so I guess I sometimes assume too quickly when it comes to articles about them. But please, if it is notable go ahead and remove the tag and work on the article. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  04:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No, see . He has had two years to produce reliable sources for this article. It just gets repeatedly re-created and, being the same junk, gets deleted again. —Centrx→talk &bull; 10:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

My Mobile Phone Edit
If you read my change to mobile phone, you will see that I got rid of patent nonsense, and I will be getting rid of it again. :-). Imaninjapirate 03:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, It's easy to do that on VandalProof :-) Imaninjapirate 03:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

VFCC
Just so you know I was actually experimenting with that and I would have reverted it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.137.175.59 (talk • contribs)
 * Ok, that's fine, but in the future please use the Sandbox for any tests you wish to make. And you don't have to redirect to images of penis angles next time. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  05:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Littleghost.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Littleghost.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Stuy userbox
Hi. I found your Stuy userbox just the type I was looking for. I prefer a more general version like this, a standard version for universities on Wikipedia. I was going to make a Stuy one but thought you could update yours, as two userboxes might seem one too many. My idea is based on yours, like <div style="float:; border:px solid ; margin:1px;">


 * Sure, that's fine. I don't really care one way or the other, since it's for anyone to use -- feel free to make any changes you like. As it happens, there is already a second stuy userbox, Template:User Stuy (really it was first and mine was second, and I'd like to say I created mine to be an alternate that was a little more standard or for some other legitimate reason, but I really just didn't know that one existed). Anyway, you can change mine, make your own, or use that one. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  03:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * That's very cool. I'm taking up your offer to change your userbox. I'll also put a note up on the talk page for the "original" template so they give this as another option. Thanks again! Xiner (talk, email) 03:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Come to think of it, could you (or I) move the userbox to User:W7KyzmJt/Userboxes/User Stuy? It'd be more standard. Xiner (talk, email) 03:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, sure. But now that I think about it, maybe it should be moved to Template:User Stuy2 or something, since as far as i can tell there's no reason it has to be in the user space according to Userbox migration. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See  <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  19:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. Very cool. Xiner (talk, email) 15:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Assertation of me-ship
I hearby do solemnly swear, under penalty of perjury, fine, prison, corporal punishment, damnation, kidnapping, extortion, rendition, detention, extrapolation, deportation, intimidation, manipulation, deprivation, migration, filtration, gyration, floatation, narration, negation, nitration, probation, notation, oration, vaxstation, vibration, alienation, ovation, optation, conjugation, masturbation, castration, humiliation, starvation, cessation, elation, formation, abdication, injunction, litigation, plantation, citation, gestation, deflation, midterm examination, secularization, cremation, Croatian, dilation, dalmation, cyberstalking, renationalization, Appalachian, higher education, guilt by association, magnetic levitation, reverse polish notation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cross my heart, on my mother's grave, and death, that I am the same person as commons:User:W7KyzmJt. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  07:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

(This is so I can vote in the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition.)

TfD nomination of Template:Manhattan Streets
Template:Manhattan Streets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --talk to Ytny 02:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[[Image:Littleghost-black.svg|100px]]
I award you the amusing image of the day award for creating a simple, yet easy to figure out image of something rather hard to create an image of 68.39.174.238 01:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  23:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

This message is in refrence to fair phyllis which you claimed I vandalized. Although I do agree that I should not have Included the "Dirty monkey fornication with john davis" My edit was not entirely incorrect. I am in choir at my school and we sing that song. My choir director, whom I might add is an expert on this particular style of music explained to my class that the song actually does depict the two engaging in sex at the end... I will be editing the song back to a more appropriate version of what I have just said and I will NOT stand for it being called vandalizing. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.85.150 (talk • contribs)
 * First of all, I'm sorry if I misinterpreted your edit. As you probably know or might have guessed, Wikipedia must maintain a strict policy on vandalism; you can read about it here. While your edits may not have actually been vandalism, as I was watching the recent changes I saw them and quickly had to pass a judgment on whether or not they were vandalism -- since, as you would imagine, Wikipedia gets quite a bit of vandalism -- and whether to revert them. In doing so I may have acted a bit too hastily. That said, your edits do fail the test of being constructive. Whether or not it is actually true that the song portrays the two having sex at the end, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia to describe it in the way that you did. Simply noting "the song actually does depict the two engaging in sex at the end," as you wrote above, would be fine. Calling it "dirty monkey fornication with john davis" is, to me and I think most other Wikipedians, an addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia (the official definition of vandalism). Now, I hope you decide that you like Wikipedia and perhaps create an account, become a regular editor of Wikipedia, and join our community; we'd be happy to have you. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  07:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my user page
He managed to get in one more edit a minute later, but since my user page talks about anonymous vandals I'm keeping it as an example. P.S. I'm stealing your Ghost userbox as soon as I find a place for it. --CliffC 17:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No prob, I'll put your page on my watchlist. And go right ahead with the box ;-). -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  02:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Your Award
Good job Robert! You've found my secret link and so you deserve this award:

Congratulations!

CareBear vandalism
Dude..you do realize you vandalized the Care Bears page? Can i have some fishy crackers? 04:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I reverted your edit, with which I assume you were trying to revert 208.100.137.251's vandalism but didn't, and then I went back and reverted the two IP vandalisms before you, that you had been trying to revert. See this was your edit, but you didn't revert the vandalism. I reverted you (since it was your edit that got flagged as vandalism even though it wasn't), and then Ireverted the IP's vandalism. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  04:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Uhhh...what?
Why did I get a message saying that I edited the page for Benji Madden saying that he's "one sexy mofo?" If it's of any consequence, Good Charlotte makes me ill and going on Benji Madden's page and editing it so that it said something stupid like that...was there possibly a mistake? 70.106.118.136 11:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If you didn't make those edits, they were probably made by a different person who had your IP address. Many Internet Service Providers rotate or change the IP addresses of their customers, and you were assigned one that had been used by a vandal to edit that page and was subsequently warned by me. So, if you didn't edit that page, don't worry about it -- you can just remove that warning from your page. -- Robert <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  01:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:User suck
Hi Robert - the picture I added to the template was actually its original picture, but I can understand that some people who have started using it since might not be happy with such an image. I will however reinstate some of my other changes that you reverted as I don't think they detract from the userbox. Cheers! --Kwekubo 11:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Mikkalai
Hi. You and I have both contributed to the page Articles for deletion/Illegal number, and complained about User:Mikkalai's incivility. I just created the page Requests for comment/Mikkalai; it looks like I would need another user to support the motion in the next 48 hours to keep the page active. Would you be interested in doing do? This is the first time I have actively complained about the decorum of an editor/admin; as such, I hope I am doing this correctly. Cheers, samwaltz 08:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks. I just left a comment at Wikiquette alerts samwaltz 19:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Absolutley
I am tired of this man thinking he is the Wiki Master. He is not anything more than anyone else is, and he has no manners, no apologies, makes rude and annoying comments, and has no respect for the newbies. I definetly am into having this user suspended from editing to show him what the users think of him.

Happy Editing! -- Stealthrabbit  talk  01:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Mikkalai
I think you need to create the page first. Stealthrabbit  Say it, baby, say it!  00:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Blue Moon
I think we just negated each other's edits to put the vandaltext back on Blue Moon. Rmasbury 03:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've done that too. Rmasbury 03:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry. I reverted it back to yours. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  03:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

My userpage
Thanks for undoing vandalism to my userpage; I didn't notice until just now. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 01:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Anytime. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  02:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 03:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. He vandalized me too, and I reported him to AIV. :-) -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  03:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Anthony.bradbury
When you reverted here were you using tools or did you do it manually. The reason I ask is that if you were using one of the scripts it may not be working correctly as it missed this. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That is odd. It must have just slipped by without an edit conflict, since my revert and his second vandalism both occurred at 00:34. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  22:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[[Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|60px]]Catherine Millet
Thanks for your advice. As I do not really kno how to do it, I leave with you here a series of literal excerpts os Ms Millet's book (these excerpts are publishable, ie small excerpts are compatible with copyright) that I would like to add to her page:


 * Today I can account for 49 men whose sexual organs have penetrated me(...). But I cannot put a number on those that blur into anonymity.
 * I was sometimes set upon so violently that I had to hold on to the ends of the table with both my hands and for a long time I bore the scar of a little gash above my coccyx, where my spine had rubbed against the rough wood. I was carried by the conviction that I rejoiced in extraordinary freedom.
 * To fuck above and beyond any sense of disgust was not just a way of lowering oneself, it was to raise yourself above all prejudice. There are those who break taboos as powerful as incest. I settled for not having to choose my partners.
 * I really like sucking men's penis.

Thanks and best regards, Pierre Guild. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.28.52 (talk • contribs)
 * Go ahead and add them, but you don't need to do it so, ah, graphically. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  19:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

GET OFF OUR PAGE

 * 1) REDIRECT Insert Text

FAGGOT! STAY OFF ST.VINCENT PALlOtTI HIGH SCHOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)


 * No. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  05:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Removing protected link
I often patrol various protected links (including Insert text and Link title, and removed one of the links left by the anonymous IP. This does not affect the tone or content of the message above. I hope this is okay. Bobo. 02:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

W7KyzmJt said: The point I was trying to make was about the ineptitude of the person who left that message. If there is any reason that the link can't or shouldn't remain there, or would inconvenience anyone in any way by being there, then please remove it. Otherwise, I would prefer that it remain.

Such is the simplicity of the Wikipedia-based vandal or indeed the persistence of those who are awake at 4am fixing Wikipedia vandalism. All in an honest day's work.

All the best. Bobo. 02:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

userboxes...
wow. nice userboxes. do you have something against feet? ~User: Sophiakorichi
 * I assume you're referring to my More Boxes page -- take a look at the last box... ;-) W7KyzmJt 21:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ah, yes, that last one would explain it. and blaming mushrooms always helps. unless, of course, you are afraid of them as i am. (i have a userbox proclaiming my deep fear of mushrooms...) by the way, you have some, erm, interesting posts on this talk page. i shal go no further in explanation or description. i think you'll understand. ;)
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * Yeah, well, I guess that's what comes from being a Recent Changes patroller and reverting a lot of vandals, who get pissed at me... it's really a thankless job. But I like doing it. W7KyzmJt 22:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * May i inquire as to how exactly you edit camels?
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * Still trying to figure that out myself ;-) W7KyzmJt 23:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * well, then. let me know when you do. its sure to be interesting.
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * Will do. Don't hold your breath, though. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  00:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I won't. for the same reasons that im afraid of mushrooms. oh, and by the way, what exactly does your username mean? do you have a strange fondness for butter...?
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * BlastOButter is (or was, I'm not sure) a brand of popcorn, and I just thought it sounded silly. I (of course) deduced from there that it would make a great screenname for AIM, and then I used it for my email address and Wikipedia, and it has stuck.
 * And all of this begs the question, why are you afraid of mushrooms? -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  00:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

List of concepts in the Ender's Game series
Aye aye. I was dreading it because such "list of" articles have a TON of redirects to fix, and this was no exception. (I also had to go to sleep and haven't been on the Internet until now.) I fixed most of them and I'm contemplating sending the rest to RFD. I mean, who would type Stark (Ender's Game)? Nobody. hbdragon88 20:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, I moved it because "Other concepts" implies that there is another list of concepts, which there isn't. A plain "Concepts" page is straightforward and doesn't leave readers wondering if there was another article or not. hbdragon88 20:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Transplanting personal messages
I stole the idea from elsewhere. I don't think the person I stole it from (whose identity I can't remember) was a particularly frequent editor, but he or she did enough for me to notice their presence on here. More than anything else it aids my memory and defragments the discussion while being able to keep it all one one talk page without annoying anyone and giving them the freedom to respond on whichever page they feel necessary.

That's the idea, anyway! Bobo. 23:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh mushrooms
i have no idea. seems pathetic, doesnt it? i suppose they're not that scary... ~Sophiakorichi
 * Well, they've got that... little... thing on top, and... some of them are poisonous. (Hey, I'm trying.) -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  00:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Very true. and poison can be rather teriffying. so i am not without reason! well, maybe i am... hehe.
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * Sure... Some people even like to eat them. I've never understood that. I think they're disgusting. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  00:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree whole-heartedly. i mean, they're rooms full of mush! honestly. i also dont like meat-loaf. c'mon, a loaf of meat? ew...
 * by the way, do you have AIM? (not sure if you consider than an ok quiestion...)
 * ~Sophiakorichi
 * Yes, it's W7KyzmJt. I suppose that would make a more efficient means of communication than this. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  01:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * it would indeed. the comp im on blocks AIM for some reason, but my AIM name and e-mail is [removed to prevent spam]@aol.com if you wish to mail me.


 * are you gone, or have yo suddenly decided that i am nolonger worthy of your response? ;0
 * ~Sophiakorchi
 * Sorry, the wireless card on my laptop just kicked out and I lost the internet. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * got it.


 * is it safe to assume that the 42 from your username pertains from the answer to life, the universe, and everything? ~Sophiakorichi
 * Actually I don't think I was thinking of that when I originally came up with it, but it certainly could. -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  04:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I suppose thats the geek coming out in me. heck, i have a userbox proclaining that im a frood who really knows where their towel is. wow. at least my username isn't in elvish! (which i happen to know..) ~Sophiakorichi
 * Hey, I was literally in the process of stealing that userbox right when you left me that message, see? -- W7KyzmJt <sup style="color:#EE7600;">See <small style="color:red;">Hear  <sub style="color:#FFB90A;">Speak  05:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

wow. thats... grerat. hehe. ~Sophiakorichi

if it says that i edited your userpage, its cause i stole some of your userboxes (as you call it). ~Sophiakorichi

ah, that would make sense. ~Sophiakorichi

Catherine Millet again
(Image:Fellatio.png removed) I followed your suggestions. Thanks and best regards, Pierre Guild.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bad Timing 2.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bad Timing 2.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bad Timing.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bad Timing.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)