User talk:WAL209

Notice of sockpuppetry block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Pedro Henrique Coelho&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Pedro Henrique Coelho. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Please ensure that you use one account—the account—for all future editing. Mz7 (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

What the hell?????? 1: that is not my account. 2: I did not edit anything, I only used the talk page to discuss some information of some articles, which is totally the point of a talk page. WAL209 (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Using the talk page is not something forbidden. I’m here to ask you nicely to unblock me. Instead of blocking me, you could easily have spoken to me on the talk page if you didn’t agree with me. I created this account right after I entered one article and saw some information that I did not agree with, and that’s why I was using the talk page. And the fact that you blocked my account accusing me of being someone else only because the other account used the same talk page as I did is delusional. Please, I ask you to reconsider your thoughts on my account. WAL209 (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

WAL209 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

This is completely unacceptable. I don’t own another account, and I don’t understand blocking me after using a talk page, I didn’t do anything wrong. WAL209 (talk) 01:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

And adding one more point, I searched this user you’re taking about and I know who they are, we both added things to the same talk page since we’re fans of the same person and we knew what we were talking about, and I used some of their arguments on my review. The administrator that asked to block me did not agree with my point of view, given that on the voting created on the talk page, they voted for an option not chosen by me. I’m sorry if I created some misunderstanding, but it’s not ok to block me when the evidence is not factual. WAL209 (talk) 02:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)