User talk:WCFrancis/Archive09

Non-free use disputed for Image:LisaDL01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LisaDL01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 13:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * This is a screenshot of Lisa De Leeuw uploaded to provide a g-rated portrait for the article about her. If this is unacceptable after 21 months on Wikipedia, please delete it. 01:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC) wcf Facts are stubborn. Comments?

Image:LisaDL02.jpg
I have tagged Image:LisaDL02.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 13:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * This illustrates one of the films of the subject of the article. If this is unacceptable after 21 months on Wikipedia, please delete it. 01:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC) wcf Facts are stubborn. Comments?

Images removed
There are no pictures because, after 21 months on wikipedia, a video box cover and a clean (G-rating would not be challenged by a reasonable person) screen cap of Ms. De Leeuw (fully dressed portrait) were considered not to meet "Fair Use" Criteria of copyright law. I hope the same criteria are being applied to the rest of Wikipedia, since there are many similar image usages. I would hate to think that erotica entries are being deliberately targeted. 13:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC) wcf Facts are stubborn. Comments?