User talk:WCS100/archives 1

Maude Apatow
Hi WCS100, in case you had not noticed, Maude Apatow, is now an article. Wanted to inform you because of your page User:WCS100/Maude Apatow. - FakirNL (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah. Thanks for the heads up.  I had this happen to me once before while building a page.  It was rather disappointing.  WCS100 (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

My DYK? Nomination
I have responded to your comments and concerns about my DYK? nomination here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Jokichi Ikarashi. Please respond to me whenever you'll have a moment. Thank you very much. Futurist110 (talk) 04:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Yuilop is not free software
You reverted my simple edit. Yuilop is not free software, neither is skype btw. Free software doesn't refer to price. Please remove the free software cat according to my edit. Palosirkka (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No.
 * While free seems to be a disputed term when it comes to apps, and I agree that apps that "free" apps that are nearly impossible to use, shouldn't be called free. In this case, the app can legitimately be used for free and the app is free.  I disagree with you and will be reverting any future edits you make to the page regarding this issue based on the precedent set across similar articles.
 * I suggest you use the talk page of the article for future discussions and avoid edit warring as I can already see that you've been warned for nearly violating WP:3RR. WCS100 (talk) 18:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Somebody explain the situation to WCS100 please. And edit the article to remove free software categories per my original edit. The free software categories exist since a very long time on Wikipedia and are not disputed. No amount of edit warring on your part is going to change this. Palosirkka (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ya, don't put a help template on my talk page again.
 * If it's not disputed, why are you having to remove it from something like 20+ articles right now?
 * You obviously have some sort of issue with people disagreeing with you. Don't use my talk page for this discussion again.  Use the talk page of the article like you're supposed to. WCS100 (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you never found a mistake on Wikipedia? Please stop the personal attacks, they're not helping. Palosirkka (talk) 18:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you're aware that falsely accusing someone of a personal attack, is in fact a person attack, right? WCS100 (talk) 18:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "Comment on content, not on the contributor" -- No personal attacks. You write above "you've been warned for nearly violating WP:3RR" and "You obviously have some sort of issue", those are comments on my person and not the substance of the edits in question. Don't go there buddy. Palosirkka (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, you're right. The second part that you have an issue wasn't good.  I apologize.  The other part where you were warned about 3RR, that's not only a fact, it pertains to this issue. WCS100 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted, no hard feelings. Palosirkka (talk) 04:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Punchline Magazine
✅ - User:WCS100/Punchline Magazine. GiantSnowman 08:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Shane Mauss explanation
I have my AWB set to automatically remove the double space after punctuation as I've always been taught not to do that and in the page itself, it still only appears as a single space after the period. On AWB it also removes it as a part of the Remove excess whitespace option. Whilst I don't have a WP:MOS to support it, there isn't one against it either, kind of like having  ==Header==  or  == Header ==  both are acceptable its up to personal preference. Had this been the only edit though, I wouldn't have done it. As noted I was actually fixing Checkwiki errors specifically in this case fixing the space after the default sort. --Lightlowemon (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Segura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Adam Carolla Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Moderation
Why did you remove Ozeki Phone System Xe from the Comparison of VoIP software page? It is very similar to other software, such as 3cx, snom, etc listed on that page. I believe it is a valuable information bit in that list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abel.pyram (talk • contribs) 20:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:WTAF. WCS100 (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Ron Funches
Hello. I saw that your new article on Ron Funches is all about Mike Lawrence, because you're planning to use the Mike Lawrence page as a template. Rather than have a misleading and confusing article in the article space, I'm just about to move the article to your user space at User:WCS100/Ron Funches where you can work on it at your convenience until it's an article about Ron Funches, at which point you can WP:MOVE it back to Ron Funches. Let me know if you have any questions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, yikes. Ya.  That was my plan.  I must have not been paying attention and put it in mainspace.  Thanks for correcting that for me.  I appreciate it. WCS100 (talk) 05:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Museum of Mathematics
Since you've decided to behave like an asshole in regard to my formatting on this article, I'm taking it off my watchlist. Please make sure to leave it on yours from now on, and protect the article from vandalism and unconstructive edits, as I have done since I first edited it in November 2013. (No need to respond, I'm not watching your talk page, and anything to post on mine will be deleted unread.) BMK (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. And just so you know, I'm keeping a note of this incident in case you're ever nominated at RFA. WCS100 (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * As another editor of this article, I think that your edits have been constructive and cooperative, and your attempts to engage in a civil discussion cannot be faulted. Please know that your efforts are appreciated, and don't let the occasional unpleasantness discourage you from making further contributions.  Best wishes,  Reify-tech (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I really appreciate that. WCS100 (talk) 18:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Comparison of VoIP software
Hi. Thank you for your notifications about my edits! I will try to keep myself neutral. Alexandr Galvita (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Van Kirk


The article Daniel Van Kirk has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up. I think there's a good chance the subject is notable.  I think we better play it out via AfD. WCS100 (talk) 01:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok:

Nomination of Daniel Van Kirk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Van Kirk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Van Kirk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UPGRADE Cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:UPGRADE Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)