User talk:WEWhistleBlower

Serious violation of NPOV
While I had unblocked you, that did not free you from your responsibility to contribute in a Neutral point of view. You have previously been accused of having come to Wikipedia only to push your agenda which includes publishing negative information about Remo Mancini. Since I unblocked you, you continued your campaign to smear Remo Mancini. You are now blocked indefinitely for continued failure to observe Neutral point of view. Toddst1 (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Indefinite Blocking of My Account by User: Toddst1
Regarding the indefinite blocking of my account by User: Toddst1for reverting the [Remo_Mancini] article to that which User:DanielRigal and I jointly authored and which quoted referenced articles from the Windsor Star newspaper, please note that I was merely following the instructions which are posted on the header of the [Remo_Mancini] article which clearly state: "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material must be removed immediately".

The material which was replaced by the prior version was poorly sourced and, given the Windsor Star articles which User:DanielRigal and I cited, were palpably contentious (as well as fallacious).

Having said that, would User: Toddst1 kindly explain how I 'smeared' anyone and further, how the reversion of the article was anything other than neutral in its point of view?

I did nothing wrong and ask that User: Toddst1 kindly unblock my account.

WEWhistleBlower (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)