User talk:WIKI1230001

December 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

October 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Lacken, County Wicklow, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Also for Dunlavin ww2censor (talk) 13:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Donard—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 11:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Donard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 11:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)