User talk:WIKIPEDIA STANDS FOR CENSORSHIP

It is truly amazing to hear that you are engaging in censorship when wikipedia has such an open policy on its activities. When you start censoring then you are FAKE NEWS !!!!!!! I have donated to you up to this point, however I will no longer donate to you or use your service. I am sorry that you have decided to be a propaganda disinformation service. Your loss.

Re:Censorship
- I'm sorry to hear you feel this way. However, Wikipedia is actually the opposite of censorship. We're actually criticized by many groups for not censoring sensitive or offensive content. Also, please check WP:NOTNEWS and you'll be happy (or unhappy) to learn that Wikipedia is not a news site, so we can't be classified as 'fake news'. As for the censorship issue, coudl you give an example as to where censorship has occurred? I could look into it for you should it be a reasonable request. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)