User talk:WIKIWIZDOM

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Danger High voltage! 18:01, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, WIKIWIZDOM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

For improving the article you have submitted, I recommend to read the general manual of style and its specialized sections, especially for mathematics, citations and lead. D.Lazard (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anupmehra 22:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Add inline citations. And much better if you could provide some more references rather than using some sort of references again and again. Believe me, this is a great article. You've done a good job. Just give it a final touch citing references. I'd be happy to help you, if you need any kinda help feel free to write on my talk page. Anup Mehra User talk:Anupmehra

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

crazy TeX code
Please. Tell me what would possess someone to write something like
 * {{F}_{\lambda }}\left( n \right)=
 * {{F}_{\lambda }}\left( n \right)=

where one could write:
 * F_\lambda (n)
 * F_\lambda (n)

The TeX code in the recent article you've created looks like something created by an utter lunatic. All the instances of multiple nesting of curly braces that serve no purpose; all the multiple instances of "matrix" and "align" where "cases" is appropriate; all the instances of nested "matrix" environments where there are no matrices or other arrays. Why do you do things like that? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Michael Hardy thank you for telling me about this, the utter lunatic in this case is MathType OSX and the way it converts and copies the formula into a wikipedia compatible format. If its a major issue what do I do about correcting this, besides manually re-writing all of these :) WIKIWIZDOM (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions


The article Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The subject of this article on mathematics is not notable. The mathematical content of the article consists in results that are trivial consequences of known theories, typically that of linear recurrences. When these known theories are cited in the article, this results always of my edits. Instead of referring to knowns theories, the article cites only non-notable publications that, for most of them, are not reliably published. The part of the article devoted to phylotaxis is a blatent WP:fringe theory and I suspect that it is also pseudo science. See the talk page for more details

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D.Lazard (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

D.Lazard (talk) 10:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Personal comments
You have twice posted comments stating that criticism of this article, by D.Lazard and Deltahedron and other editors, is not justified and prejudiced: and. This sort of personal comment is not helpful, and I am not going to trouble myself to answer it here. You should review No personal attacks, part of Civility core policy, and decide for yourself whether you should be making these remarks. Deltahedron (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Deltahedron thank you for letting me know, but this message was never intended as a personal attack on anyone. I am surprised you would interpret it that way. WIKIWIZDOM (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Personal attack against an anonymous user
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I recall you that this personal attack against an anonymous user is not your first personal attack, and that you have already been warned for that reason. D.Lazard (talk) 11:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Edits by an IP user
There is a strong similarity between the comments you have made at Articles for deletion/Hyperbolic Fibonacci and Lucas functions and those of. If those comments were made by you while logged out, it would be advisable to make that clear. If not, then of course there is no need to do anything. Deltahedron (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexey Stakhov


The article Alexey Stakhov has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Promotional article by WP:SPA, almost certainly an autobiography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 22:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)