User talk:WITASWAN

Speedy deletion of WITASWAN
A tag has been placed on WITASWAN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 00:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of WITASWAN
A tag has been placed on WITASWAN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Rjd0060 23:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Rjd0060 23:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

- Krakatoa  Katie  05:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: WITASWAN
Hello – thanks for the message. You asked how your ideas sounded? Well, put bluntly, it sounds to me like you're trying to write an article about a laudable but non-notable non-commercial organization, and you have a clear conflict of interest in the subject. A word of caution: be careful if you decide to create a third version like the first two, because pages that are repeatedly re-created after the deletion process can be protected from further re-creation with a little salt. If you create this page again, work closely to the five pillars and the Manual of Style. If I were you, I would wait several months, at least until the group gains attention from more verifiable, reliable sources. Blogs don't count – newspapers and magazines do. The WITASWAN people might not like it, but there's not much else to say. Sometimes groups (and many, many individuals) overestimate their encyclopedic value. Wikipedia is not a directory.

It's unfortunate that a paid assignment is your first experience with Wikipedia, because we can always use good writers and editors. We have more than 2,000,000 articles, and last time I checked there were something like 8,200 articles in need of attention. I hope you decide to register a new username, or edit anonymously, and join us in our quest to build and improve our free encyclopedia. Thanks again for the message. - Krakatoa  Katie  05:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)