User talk:WITechGuy

February 2013
Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Digital sweatshop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Todd: Rather than deleting it, why didn't you Edit it with information you thought was missing? You might have time to waste editing documents etc for no commission what so ever, however, I manage a F/T IT Counseling company working with the platforms/digital sweatshop provider links I posted and you deleted.  So be it.  I don't have time to waste fighting with others that don't review All the new information before deleting it because s/he doesn't like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WITechGuy (talk • contribs) 16:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Reliable sourcing is the contributor's responsibility, per WP:V policy. I have again removed that info because it fails that and other policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Indeed it is. See WP:BURDEN for more info. Toddst1 (talk) 18:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, WITechGuy. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2013 (UTC)