User talk:WLior

Hausdorff dimension
The definition needs cleanup. WLior 06:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Hasse-Weil zeta function
Rearrange and improve discussion of Langlands's Conjectures and Taniyama-Shimura. WLior 06:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Taniyama-Shimura Theorem
Move to Modularity Theorem and rename "Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture". WLior 06:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Done by Charles Matthews on February 1, 2007. WLior 01:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments on my edits
Talk to me!

Julius König
Thank you for improving my article on Julius König. Perhaps you would like to have a look on the following articles too: Jules Richard, Actual infinity, Paradoxes of Set Theory.

In particular I have quoted some German literature there, which should be available and would be preferable in English. Regards, WM 15:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Paradoxes of set theory
Hi WLior, I see you were on this site. Your correction is welcome. (By "cardinal" I meant an abbreviation for cardinal number as one sometimes says real instead of real number. But that might have been too much slang.) 217.94.220.246 07:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Regards, WM


 * Using "cardinal" is ok, but it's not great English. Rather than saying "the number of people in the US is larger than the number of people in Canada" normal usage is "the population of the US is larger than the population of Canada".  In other words, it's more natural (and shorter) to talk about the "cardinality" of a set rather than of the "associated cardinal number". WLior 13:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Hajj
Hi. You seem to have reverted my edit to the calendar issue in the introduction. I think it's better to say you can't peg Mulism holidays to the solar year than to the Gergorian calendar, since the issue is independent of the solar calendar you use (you can't peg them to the Persian calendar any more than the Gergorian one). The difference is between the lengths of the solar year and 12 lunar months, not between any two particular calendars. WLior (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * e does not redirect to solar calendar; it redirects to tropical year, which is not precisely the same thing. And, yes, it's true that you cannot peg the event to the Iranian calendar, but you can't peg it to a variety of other things either (say, for example, the Hebrew calendar). The point is that you can't peg it to the most commonly used calendar, the Gregorian calendar. Yes, there are other calendars, ones that aren't used as widely, but the comparison is mostly there help the average reader – who primarily knows the Gregorian calendar – understand the concept. --  tariq abjotu  05:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't make sense to say that the "Gregorian Calendar" is 11 days longer. The calendar lasts forever -- it's the year that's longer. I'll try something to that effect. WLior (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Blatt (December 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Blatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lisa Blatt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lisa_Blatt Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lisa_Blatt reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lisa Blatt


Hello, WLior. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lisa Blatt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 17:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

József Solymosi distinction
Hi WLior, I hadn't noticed that I removed the distinction from the top of József Solymosi, it was accidental, thanks for restoring! GanzKnusper (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem -- I guessed that's what happened. WLior (talk) 11:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)