User talk:WM MED1/Satiety

JJStudent peer-review
The drafted article on satiety has good readability but appears to be at a high reading level with terms like proximal, afferent, and efferent. One suggestion to mitigate confusion regarding this would be to link wiki articles with those words to their respective pages explaining afferent and efferent nerves. You nicely stayed on topic touching on the science of satiety but not getting in the weeds on the topic. You could increase organization and flow by splitting your paragraphs into headers such as "Mechanism" and "Signaling Factors". The impact of images and figures in this article could go either way. You could use it to visually explain the stomach and vagus nerve but is not necessarily required. Citations appear well written and placed adequately with nice paraphrasing of the literature. Your sources are high quality and are up to date information. You have nicely avoided bias and have written a well-rounded, equal sided argument. JJstudent (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)