User talk:WOLFE0007

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Zhang He. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * They arent un constructive they're just what he was doing tonight


 * An uninvited change to another editor's userpage is unconstructive. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * oh ur mean the part on his button thing not his talk page ok i understand that

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Zhang He. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Manway (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * explain to me how this is being a vanal he warned my ip 3 times because i changed his edit where he changed nate diaz to nick diaz on ufc 11 repeatedly so explain that

This is the final warning that you are receiving  regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:Zhang He. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Manway (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism Reports
See WP:AIV. --Manway (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC) wow and now i bet u feel like a big man on wikipedia cause blocked me and wont respond maybe u should grow a pair and realise wikipedia is usless in real life espaecially because any paper using it as a source will just be failed so get off ur high hourse and be a man  all i did was try and stop unwarrented censorship and get someone admit they were wrong for warning my ip WOLFE0007 (talk) 05:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked for two weeks, to be specific. Two personal attacks, followed by vandalising articles immediately after returning from a block is hardly the behaviour of a constructive editor. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


 * well the first block was due to censorship and also am i supposed to care that some fag on the internet finds me an unconstructive editor. anyways last time i was editing things properly i got warned twice by a guy for not letting him change a fighters name so honestly grow up wikipedia is useless anyways if it was a legitimate publication it would not be black  ball as a source from grade 4  on. WOLFE0007 (talk) 01:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)