User talk:WORDSLAYERCHAMP123

July 2018
Hello, I'm Gooseflesh12. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Rohit Sharma, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ★ Gooseflesh12 ★ ( talk ) 15:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Your source did not support Rohit Sharma as "considered one of the greatest of all time". Jim1138 (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Rohit Sharma
I "deleted your content" because it was unsourced. Kleuske (talk) 16:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Rohit Sharma
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Rohit Sharma article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Girth Summit  (blether) 14:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

My submission
But then how do u write sachin tendulkar as the greatest batsman of all times?It seems even this is a promotional language? WORDSLAYERCHAMP123 (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brendon McCullum has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brendon McCullum was changed by WORDSLAYERCHAMP123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87244 on 2019-02-09T07:49:50+00:00

Recent edit to Brendon McCullum
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Brendon McCullum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Gough (cricketer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Gough (cricketer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Gough (cricketer), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Michael Gough (cricketer) was changed by WORDSLAYERCHAMP123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850742 on 2019-06-28T16:34:06+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism, as you did at Michael Gough (cricketer). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rohit Sharma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * That warning message is auto-generated but it isn't specific so I'll explain. You have again breached WP:NPOV having been warned about that before (see above). Articles must be written objectively. We do not allow subjective views unless there are considerable sources which justify their inclusion and, even then, the sourced opinion must be expressed objectively with, if possible, sourced counter-arguments added. Even so, we do allow "greatest of all time" proclamations under any circumstances. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:52, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Virat kohli
Then how did you allow "Virat Kohli" wikipedia page to be edited and revised wherein it is written as "greatest of all time ".I had also provided verified citations to prove my point too! WORDSLAYERCHAMP123 (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Different circumstances entirely. See the extent of sourcing and the objectivity of the narrative. If you think Kohli should not be described in that way, please make your point on the article talk page or perhaps with the cricket project. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)