User talk:WSU-AWT-RAED

Speedy deletion nomination of Protege 2000
A tag has been placed on Protege 2000, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Protege 2000 and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Semantic Wen In Our Days


The article Semantic Wen In Our Days has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Essay.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Semantic Wen In Our Days
An article that you have been involved in editing, Semantic Wen In Our Days, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Semantic Web in Our Days
A tag has been placed on Semantic Web in Our Days, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Forks
Have you looked at the Semantic Web article? Is it inadequate? If so, please improve it. &mdash; RHaworth 16:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Topics in Semantic Web


The article Topics in Semantic Web has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Personal essay, and we have a semantic web article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I replaced this with a speedy deletion request when I discovered the history of your activity, above. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
I have blocked you briefly since you are ignoring our advice. &mdash; RHaworth 04:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)