User talk:WTillman29

Welcome!
Hello, WTillman29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Doug have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doug, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: and these edits at other pages Future events must be sourced per WP:CRYSTAL.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of programs broadcast by FamilyNet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs broadcast by FamilyNet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by FamilyNet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Digifan23 (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Doug episodes. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Diffs: Unexplained reordering of episodes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Doug episodes. ''Diff: Based on the included source, this looks like deliberate introduction of incorrect information. As previously mentioned, you should not be making changes like this without providing sources, or an explanation.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  20:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * This block is now indefinite in light of your evasion of it with a sockpuppet,, and your carrying on regardless of concerns about your editing. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  02:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)